MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2004

A phase II randomized study of topical intrarectal administration of amifostine for the prevention of acute radiation-induced rectal toxicity.

Клиническое исследованиеКлиническое исследование II фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kouloulias Vassilis E, Kouvaris John R, Pissakas George, Kokakis John D, Antypas Christos, Mallas Elias, Matsopoulos George, Michopoulos Spyros, Vosdoganis Sofoklis-Panagiotis, Kostakopoulos Athanasios, Vlahos Lambros J

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To investigate the cytoprotective effect of intrarectal amifostine administration on acute radiation-induced rectal toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: 67 patients with T1b-2 N0 M0 prostate cancer were randomized to receive amifostine intrarectally (group A, n = 33) or not (group B, n = 34) before irradiation. Therapy was delivered using a four-field technique with three-dimensional conformal planning. In group A, 1,500 mg amifostine was administered intrarectally as an aqueous solution in a 40-ml enema. Two different toxicity scales were used: EORTC/RTOG rectal and urologic toxicity criteria along with a Subjective-RectoSigmoid (S-RS) scale based on the endoscopic terminology of the World Organization for Digestive Endoscopy. Objective measurements with rectosigmoidoscopy were performed at baseline and 1-2 days after the completion of radiotherapy. The area under curve for the time course of mucositis (RTOG criteria) during irradiation represented the mucositis index (MI).

RESULTS: Intrarectal amifostine was feasible and well tolerated without any systemic or local side effects. According to the RTOG toxicity scale, five out of 33 patients showed grade 1 mucositis in group A versus 15 out of 34 patients with grade 1/2 in group B (p = 0.026). Mean rectal MI was 0.3 +/- 0.1 in group A versus 2.2 +/- 0.4 in group B (p < 0.001), while S-RS score was 3.9 +/- 0.5 in group A versus 6.3 +/- 0.7 in group B (p < 0.001). The incidence of urinary toxicity was the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION: Intrarectal administration of amifostine seems to have a cytoprotective efficacy in acute radiation-induced rectal mucositis. Further randomized studies are needed for definitive therapeutic decisions.

Предметные рубрики MeSH