MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.healun.2023.10.013

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2023

Donation after circulatory death significantly reduces waitlist times while not changing post-heart transplant outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Analysis.

Ahmed Hosam F, Kulshrestha Kevin, Kennedy John T, Gomez-Guzman Amalia, Greenberg Jason W, Hossain Md Monir, Zhang Yin, D'Alessandro David A, John Ranjit, Moazami Nader, Chin Clifford, Ashfaq Awais, Zafar Farhan, Morales David L S

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Recently, several centers in the United States have begun performing donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplants (HTs) in adults. We sought to characterize the recent use of DCD HT, waitlist time, and outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD).

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 10,402 adult (aged >18 years) HT recipients from January 2019 to June 2022 were identified: 425 (4%) were DCD and 9,977 (96%) were DBD recipients. Posttransplant outcomes in matched and unmatched cohorts and waitlist times were compared between groups.

RESULTS

DCD and DBD recipients had similar age (57 years for both, p = 0.791). DCD recipients were more likely White (67% vs 60%, p = 0.002), on left ventricular assist device (LVAD; 40% vs 32%, p < 0.001), and listed as status 4 to 6 (60% vs 24%, p < 0.001); however, less likely to require inotropes (22% vs 40%, p < 0.001) and preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.9% vs 6%, p < 0.001). DCD donors were younger (29 vs 32 years, p < 0.001) and had less renal dysfunction (15% vs 39%, p < 0.001), diabetes (1.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.050), or hypertension (9.9% vs 16%, p = 0.001). In matched and unmatched cohorts, early survival was similar (p = 0.22). Adjusted waitlist time was shorter in DCD group (21 vs 31 days, p < 0.001) compared to DBD cohort and 5-fold shorter (DCD: 22 days vs DBD: 115 days, p < 0.001) for candidates in status 4 to 6, which was 60% of DCD cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The community is using DCD mostly for those recipients who are expected to have extended waitlist times (e.g., durable LVADs, status >4). DCD recipients had similar posttransplant early survival and shorter adjusted waitlist time compared to DBD group. Given this early success, efforts should be made to expand the donor pool using DCD, especially for traditionally disadvantaged recipients on the waitlist.

Для цитирования: Ahmed Hosam F, Kulshrestha Kevin, Kennedy John T, Gomez-Guzman Amalia, Greenberg Jason W, Hossain Md Monir, Zhang Yin, D'Alessandro David A, John Ranjit, Moazami Nader, Chin Clifford, Ashfaq Awais, Zafar Farhan, Morales David L S. Donation after circulatory death significantly reduces waitlist times while not changing post-heart transplant outcomes: A United Network for Organ Sharing Analysis.. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.10.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.