The MAGIC composite response: a novel end point integrating clinical and biomarker parameters for acute GVHD.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akahoshi Yu, Portelli Joseph, Katsivelos Nikolaos, Louloudis Ioannis E, Aguayo-Hiraldo Paibel, Ayuk Francis, Chanswangphuwana Chantiya, Choe Hannah K, Eder Matthias, Etra Aaron M, Hexner Elizabeth O, Kitko Carrie L, Kraus Sabrina, Merli Pietro, Olson Timothy S, Pasic Ivan, Qayed Muna, Reshef Ran, Schechter Tal, Marx Julia, Ullrich Evelyn, Vasova Ingrid, Weber Daniela, Wölfl Matthias, Zeiser Robert, Baez Janna, Eng Gilbert, Gleich Sigrun, Kowalyk Steven, Morales George, Spyrou Nikolaos, Young Rachel, DeFilipp Zachariah, Hogan William J, Nakamura Ryotaro, Levine John E, Ferrara James L M
Аннотация
Changes in the clinical symptoms of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are currently used to assess treatment responses. The Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) consortium has recently revealed that the integration of serum biomarkers with clinical symptoms at the onset of treatment in a MAGIC composite score (MCS) more accurately predicts treatment response and 6-month nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than clinical symptoms alone. In this study, we evaluated whether the integration of serum biomarkers and clinical symptoms on day 28 (D28) would also better predict NRM than clinical response only (CRO). We analyzed data from 1135 patients receiving systemic treatment for acute GVHD and created a fourth MCS category for patients with complete resolution of symptoms and low-risk clinical biomarkers on D28. Using a classification and regression tree model with 6-month NRM as the end point, we identified status of MCS 0 or MCS 1 at D28 as responses, which we termed the MAGIC composite response (MCR). In the validation cohort (n = 309), MCR more accurately predicted 6-month NRM than CRO (area under the curve: 0.77 vs 0.69; P = .014) and demonstrated higher negative and positive predictive values. MCR correctly reclassified both clinical nonresponders and responders: 28 of 213 clinical responders (13%) became nonresponders with fivefold higher NRM (34.3% vs 6.8%, P < .001) and a larger group (29/96, 30%) of clinical nonresponders became responders with sixfold lower NRM (7.6% vs 50.7%, P < .001). These findings support the use of MCR as a superior surrogate end point for long-term GVHD control and survival in future clinical trials.