MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.014

Медицинская библиотека · Heart rhythm · 2022

Ultrasound-guided extracardiac vagal stimulation-New approach for visualization of the vagus nerve during cardioneuroablation.

Piotrowski Roman, Zuk Anna, Baran Jakub, Sikorska Agnieszka, Krynski Tomasz, Kulakowski Piotr

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fluoroscopy-guided extracardiac vagal stimulation (ECVS) from the internal right and left jugular veins (RIJV and LIJV) is routinely used to document vagal response (sinus arrest and/or atrioventricular block) during cardioneuroablation. Ultrasound-guided ECVS allows direct visualization and selective stimulation of the vagus nerve (VN).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of ultrasound-guided ECVS and to compare it with fluoroscopy-guided ECVS.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 48 patients (25 men [52%]; mean age 38 ± 15 years) in whom fluoroscopy-guided ECVS and ultrasound-guided ECVS were performed. For fluoroscopy-guided ECVS, a pacing electrode was introduced into the RIJV and into the LIJV up to the level of the jugular foramen under fluoroscopic guidance. For ultrasound-guided ECVS, the VN and electrode were visualized using ultrasonography. Partial vagal response was defined as induction of sinus arrest or atrioventricular block, whereas full vagal response was defined as induction of both.

RESULTS

ECVS was performed in all patients from the RIJV and in 45 from the LIJV. Visualization of the VN using ultrasound was possible in 44 patients (92%). During ECVS from the RIJV, partial vagal response was obtained in 39 (81%) using fluoroscopy-guided ECVS vs 45 (94%) using ultrasound-guided ECVS (not significant) whereas full vagal response was obtained in 27 patients (56%) using fluoroscopy-guided ECVS vs 40 (83%) using ultrasound-guided ECVS (P = .0071). For ECVS from the LIJV, partial vagal response was achieved in 40 (89%) vs 44 (98%) patients (not significant) whereas full vagal response was achieved in 30 (67%) vs 40 (89%) patients (P = .021) (fluoroscopy-guided ECVS vs ultrasound-guided ECVS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided ECVS is feasible and full vagal response is achieved significantly more frequently than using fluoroscopy-guided ECVS.

Для цитирования: Piotrowski Roman, Zuk Anna, Baran Jakub, Sikorska Agnieszka, Krynski Tomasz, Kulakowski Piotr. Ultrasound-guided extracardiac vagal stimulation-New approach for visualization of the vagus nerve during cardioneuroablation.. Heart rhythm. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.04.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.