Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2009
Input-output relationships of a somatosympathetic reflex in human spinal injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Brown Rachael, Burton Alexander, Macefield Vaughan G
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord injury results in loss of supraspinal control of sympathetic outflow, yet preservation of spinal reflexes. Given the importance of reflex activation of sympathetic vasoconstrictor neurones to the generation of autonomic dysreflexia, we assessed the input-output relationship of the spinal somatosympathetic reflex induced by electrical activation of cutaneous afferents over the lower abdominal wall.
METHODS: In 13 spinal cord-injured subjects (C4-T10) we tested the hypothesis that the magnitude and duration of the vasoconstriction is directly related to the magnitude and duration of the stimulus train. Cutaneous vasoconstriction was measured with photoelectric plethysmography over a finger and toe; continuous blood pressure was recorded by radial artery tonometry, heart rate by ECG chest electrodes and sweat release by skin conductance. Four sets of trains of cutaneous electrical stimuli (20 Hz 1 s, 20 Hz 20 s, 20 Hz 1 s alternating on-and-off for 20 s and 1 Hz 20 s) were applied to the abdominal wall (10 mA) at 2-min intervals.
RESULTS: Nine subjects showed vasoconstrictor responses to the stimulus trains. On average, both the magnitude and duration of the responses were similar irrespective of the type of stimulus train.
INTERPRETATION: We conclude that there is a non-linear relationship between somatic inputs and sympathetic vasoconstrictor outputs, and argue that a sustained vasoconstriction need not imply continuous sensory input to the spinal cord.
METHODS: In 13 spinal cord-injured subjects (C4-T10) we tested the hypothesis that the magnitude and duration of the vasoconstriction is directly related to the magnitude and duration of the stimulus train. Cutaneous vasoconstriction was measured with photoelectric plethysmography over a finger and toe; continuous blood pressure was recorded by radial artery tonometry, heart rate by ECG chest electrodes and sweat release by skin conductance. Four sets of trains of cutaneous electrical stimuli (20 Hz 1 s, 20 Hz 20 s, 20 Hz 1 s alternating on-and-off for 20 s and 1 Hz 20 s) were applied to the abdominal wall (10 mA) at 2-min intervals.
RESULTS: Nine subjects showed vasoconstrictor responses to the stimulus trains. On average, both the magnitude and duration of the responses were similar irrespective of the type of stimulus train.
INTERPRETATION: We conclude that there is a non-linear relationship between somatic inputs and sympathetic vasoconstrictor outputs, and argue that a sustained vasoconstriction need not imply continuous sensory input to the spinal cord.