Preliminary results of endovascular stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stent placement for intracranial atherosclerosis has become an alternative treatment technique; however, stent placement for middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis remains a technical and clinical challenge. Our purpose was to assess the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of stent placement for MCA stenosis.
METHODS
Between May 1998 and August 2003, we performed stent placement for MCA stenosis (more than 50%) in 17 patients and retrospectively analyzed the technical success rate, complications, and outcomes over 10 months.
RESULTS
Stent placement was technically successful in 16 (94.1%) patients and failed in one patient (5.9%), because the stent did not reach the lesion due to carotid artery tortuousity. In 16 patients, postprocedural angiography showed restoration of the normal luminal diameter. Acute in-stent thromboses occurred in nine patients (56.3%) and was lysed with abciximab. The parent artery ruptured in two patients (12.5%): One died from massive subarachnoid hemorrhage, and the other patient received a second stent over the tear site. Stent jumping (distal migration at the time of balloon inflation) occurred in one patient (6.3%) and was solved by implanting a second stent. Periprocedural complications included subacute in-stent thrombosis (n = 1, 6.3%) and minor stroke (n=1, 6.3%); these were relieved with heparin therapy or local thrombolysis. Fifteen patients experienced symptomatic relief or were stable at follow-up. Angiographic follow-up (n=6) revealed no in-stent restenosis.
CONCLUSION
Stent placement for symptomatic MCA stenosis was technically feasible and effective in alleviating symptoms and improving cerebral blood flow.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.