Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2000
Thermal thresholds in complex regional pain syndrome type I: sensitivity and repeatability of the methods of limits and levels.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kemler M A, Reulen J P, van Kleef M, Barendse G A, van den Wildenberg F A, Spaans F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To study whether the method of levels (MLE) or the method of limits (MLI) is preferable as a method of measuring thermal perception thresholds in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I).
METHODS: Perception thresholds for warmth and cold were measured twice, with both MLE and MLI, at a 1 month interval, both at unaffected and affected wrists (n=33) or feet (n=20) of patients with CRPS I of one extremity.
RESULTS: (1) Sensitivity for pathology was equal for both methods. (2) The agreement between thresholds measured by both methods was low at all locations, except for the unaffected wrist. Since thresholds measured with the MLI always contain reaction time artefacts, this lack of agreement favours the MLE. (3) At both unaffected and affected wrists, the MLE showed significantly better coefficients of repeatability as compared to the MLI for both sensations. However, at both unaffected and affected feet, there was no preference for either method as far as threshold measurement repeatability was concerned.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal thermal perception thresholds occurred in 20% (foot) to 36% (wrist) of the CRPS I patients on the affected side and in 15% (foot, wrist) on the unaffected side. The MLE is considered to be the preferable method to assess thermal perception thresholds in CRPS I.
METHODS: Perception thresholds for warmth and cold were measured twice, with both MLE and MLI, at a 1 month interval, both at unaffected and affected wrists (n=33) or feet (n=20) of patients with CRPS I of one extremity.
RESULTS: (1) Sensitivity for pathology was equal for both methods. (2) The agreement between thresholds measured by both methods was low at all locations, except for the unaffected wrist. Since thresholds measured with the MLI always contain reaction time artefacts, this lack of agreement favours the MLE. (3) At both unaffected and affected wrists, the MLE showed significantly better coefficients of repeatability as compared to the MLI for both sensations. However, at both unaffected and affected feet, there was no preference for either method as far as threshold measurement repeatability was concerned.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal thermal perception thresholds occurred in 20% (foot) to 36% (wrist) of the CRPS I patients on the affected side and in 15% (foot, wrist) on the unaffected side. The MLE is considered to be the preferable method to assess thermal perception thresholds in CRPS I.