MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5830/cvja-2024-014

Медицинская библиотека · Cardiovascular journal of Africa · 2025

A scoping review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for care of people with cardiovascular disease in African countries.

Akanyirige Precious W, Mensah Cheryl, Holder Kai, Beestrum Molly, Chillo Pilly, Mlay Jackson, Kaaya Sylvia, Hawkins Claudia, Hirschhorn Lisa R

Scoping ReviewСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Poor healthcare outcomes from cardiovascular disease (CVD) have prompted a shift towards measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to improve quality of care. We conducted a scoping review of the current use of PRO measures (PROMs) in the care of people with CVD in African countries.

METHODS

This study included studies that reported the use of at least one PROM in participants with CVD. The study took place in at least one African country.

RESULTS

The 25 included studies originating from13 countries were primarily observational (n = 23), and most commonly studied adults with congestive heart failure (n = 17). Themost common PROM was quality of life (QOL) (n = 17). Overall QOL was poor; lower QOL was associated with various clinical and patient factors.

CONCLUSION

Further work is needed to expand the availability of adapted PROMs and to explore effective implementation strategies to better integrate their use into clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Akanyirige Precious W, Mensah Cheryl, Holder Kai, Beestrum Molly, Chillo Pilly, Mlay Jackson, Kaaya Sylvia, Hawkins Claudia, Hirschhorn Lisa R. A scoping review on the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for care of people with cardiovascular disease in African countries.. Cardiovascular journal of Africa. 2025. DOI: 10.5830/cvja-2024-014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.