The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2025
Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% gel in Hispanic participants with moderate-to-severe acne: a pooled analysis.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Callender Valerie D, Baldwin Hilary, Gold Linda Stein, Cook-Bolden Fran E, Guenin Eric, Alexis Andrew F
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel is the only fixed-dose, triple-combination approved for acne. In phase 2 and 3 studies, CAB demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and component dyads. This post hoc analysis examined efficacy/tolerability of CAB in 147 self-identified Hispanic/Latino participants (referred to as Hispanic).
METHODS: Data were pooled from one phase 2 (NCT03170388) and two phase 3 (NCT04214652, NCT04214639) double-blind, 12-week studies. Eligible participants aged ≥9 years with moderate to severe acne were randomized to once-daily CAB or vehicle. Endpoints included ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score with clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.
RESULTS: At week 12, 56.2% of CAB-treated participants achieved treatment success vs 18.4% with vehicle (p < 0.001). Reductions in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions were 77.1%/76.2% with CAB vs 56.4%/45.0% with vehicle, respectively (p < 0.001, all). CAB TEAE rates were similar to overall study populations (27.0% vs 24.6%-36.2%). Baseline hyperpigmentation scores decreased from 0.6 to 0.3 (1 = mild) at week 12 with CAB. CAB gel was efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in Hispanic participants. Limitations include lack of Fitzpatrick skin phototype and short study duration.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for acne treatment with CAB in ethnically diverse populations.
METHODS: Data were pooled from one phase 2 (NCT03170388) and two phase 3 (NCT04214652, NCT04214639) double-blind, 12-week studies. Eligible participants aged ≥9 years with moderate to severe acne were randomized to once-daily CAB or vehicle. Endpoints included ≥2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score with clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed.
RESULTS: At week 12, 56.2% of CAB-treated participants achieved treatment success vs 18.4% with vehicle (p < 0.001). Reductions in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions were 77.1%/76.2% with CAB vs 56.4%/45.0% with vehicle, respectively (p < 0.001, all). CAB TEAE rates were similar to overall study populations (27.0% vs 24.6%-36.2%). Baseline hyperpigmentation scores decreased from 0.6 to 0.3 (1 = mild) at week 12 with CAB. CAB gel was efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in Hispanic participants. Limitations include lack of Fitzpatrick skin phototype and short study duration.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for acne treatment with CAB in ethnically diverse populations.