MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7205/milmed-d-15-00463

Медицинская библиотека · Military medicine · 2017

Traumatic Hearing Loss in the Context of Blast-Related Tympanic Membrane Perforation.

Pusz Max D, Robitschek Jon

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Identify associated clinical factors and characterize the various forms of hearing loss in the context of blast-related traumatic tympanic membrane (TM) perforation sustained in the combat setting.

METHODS

A prospective study of 41 patients who sustained a TM perforation secondary to blast injury between 2010 and 2012 while serving in combat. Clinical examinations and audiograms were obtained for all patients by a single-institution Otolaryngology service with comparative data generated from review of pre and post-trauma hearing screens. Follow-up clinical and audiogram data were obtained on all available subjects.

RESULTS

59 TM perforations were documented with audiograms. A conductive hearing loss of 14.8, 22.4, 20.3, and 18.9 dB and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) of 18.0, 13.5, 19.9, and 22.0 dB at 500, 1,000, 3,000, and 4,000 Hz, respectively, were observed. 49% of all hearing loss was SNHL. Clinical factors did not correlate statically to hearing loss (p > 0.05). On average, patients demonstrated a 51% improvement in SNHL at time of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In the subacute setting, patients with traumatic TM perforations secondary to combat blast injury demonstrate both a conductive hearing loss and SNHL, with 49% of all loss being sensorineural. An average SNHL improvement of 51% was seen at follow-up.

Для цитирования: Pusz Max D, Robitschek Jon. Traumatic Hearing Loss in the Context of Blast-Related Tympanic Membrane Perforation.. Military medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-15-00463.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.