International journal of clinical practice · 2021
Is heart rate variability a risk factor for premature ejaculation?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Erbay Güven, Ceyhun Gökhan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the parameters of heart rate variability, which is an indicator of the change in autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity, in individuals with premature ejaculation (PE).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed by comparing 40 patients with PE (mean age, 31.2 ± 4.1 years) and 40 healthy individuals (mean age, 30.4 ± 4.8 years) without PE from May 2018 to December 2019. HRV parameters were compared between men with PE and healthy controls in 24-hour heart rhythm Holter examination.
RESULTS: In the time domain analysis, which is a subgroup of HRV, square root of differences between consecutive normal NN intervals (RMSSD), which is an indicator of parasympathetic activity, was lower in patients with PE compared with controls (P = .025). Moreover, within the frequency domain analysis, high frequency (HF), another indicator of parasympathetic activity, was lower in patients compared with controls (P = .032). Finally, the LF/HF ratio, reflecting sympathetic/parasympathetic activity ratio, was significantly higher in patients compared with controls (P = .008). Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LF/HF ratio is independently associated with PE (P = .005). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of LF/HF above 2.7 predicted PE at a sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 82.5% (positive predictive value: 81.5% and negative predictive value: 78.5%).
CONCLUSION: Different HRV parameters were exhibited in the comparison of patients with PE and normal controls. It suggests that the change in HRV parameters will be an indicator of imbalance in ANS and this imbalance may cause PE. Therefore, HRV analysis can be a diagnostic tool to assess altered ANS activity in patients with PE and may be considered as a rapid screening tool.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was performed by comparing 40 patients with PE (mean age, 31.2 ± 4.1 years) and 40 healthy individuals (mean age, 30.4 ± 4.8 years) without PE from May 2018 to December 2019. HRV parameters were compared between men with PE and healthy controls in 24-hour heart rhythm Holter examination.
RESULTS: In the time domain analysis, which is a subgroup of HRV, square root of differences between consecutive normal NN intervals (RMSSD), which is an indicator of parasympathetic activity, was lower in patients with PE compared with controls (P = .025). Moreover, within the frequency domain analysis, high frequency (HF), another indicator of parasympathetic activity, was lower in patients compared with controls (P = .032). Finally, the LF/HF ratio, reflecting sympathetic/parasympathetic activity ratio, was significantly higher in patients compared with controls (P = .008). Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that LF/HF ratio is independently associated with PE (P = .005). The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value of LF/HF above 2.7 predicted PE at a sensitivity of 77.5% and specificity of 82.5% (positive predictive value: 81.5% and negative predictive value: 78.5%).
CONCLUSION: Different HRV parameters were exhibited in the comparison of patients with PE and normal controls. It suggests that the change in HRV parameters will be an indicator of imbalance in ANS and this imbalance may cause PE. Therefore, HRV analysis can be a diagnostic tool to assess altered ANS activity in patients with PE and may be considered as a rapid screening tool.