Journal of vascular surgery · 2023
A comparison of suprarenal and infrarenal fixation and renal volumetric analysis after endovascular aneurysm repair.
Рандомизированное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yven Cedric, Pluchon Kevin, Le Corvec Tom, Maurel Blandine, Nasr Bahaa
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Clinical and experimental studies of the stent-graft fixation impact on the renal volume after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have focused on glomerular filtration rate, and the results were controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the impact of the suprarenal (SRF group) and infrarenal (IRF group) stent-graft fixation on the renal volume.
METHODS: Between December 2016 and December 2019, all patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with atrophic or multicystic kidney, renal transplantation, ultrasound examination, or incomplete follow-up were excluded. The renal volume in both groups was extracted with a semiautomatic segmentation from contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan performed before the procedure, at 1 month, and at 12 months of follow-up. A subgroup analysis of the SRF group was performed in order to study the impact of the stent strut position relative to the renal arteries.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were analyzed (SRF: 32 and IRF: 31). Demographic and anatomic characteristics were similar between the groups. The procedure contrast volume was higher in the IRF group (P = .01). At 12 months, we observed a decrease in the renal volume of 1.4% in the SRF group and 2.3% in the IRF group (P = .86). The SRF subgroup analysis showed only two patients with no stent struts crossing the renal arteries. In the remaining cases, struts crossed one renal artery in 60% of cases (19 patients) and two renal arteries in 34% of cases (11 patients). The renal volume decrease was not correlated with the presence of stent wire struts, crossing a renal artery.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent graft with suprarenal fixation seems not to be correlated with renal volume deterioration. A randomized clinical trial with a higher effective and longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of SRF on renal function.
METHODS: Between December 2016 and December 2019, all patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with atrophic or multicystic kidney, renal transplantation, ultrasound examination, or incomplete follow-up were excluded. The renal volume in both groups was extracted with a semiautomatic segmentation from contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan performed before the procedure, at 1 month, and at 12 months of follow-up. A subgroup analysis of the SRF group was performed in order to study the impact of the stent strut position relative to the renal arteries.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients were analyzed (SRF: 32 and IRF: 31). Demographic and anatomic characteristics were similar between the groups. The procedure contrast volume was higher in the IRF group (P = .01). At 12 months, we observed a decrease in the renal volume of 1.4% in the SRF group and 2.3% in the IRF group (P = .86). The SRF subgroup analysis showed only two patients with no stent struts crossing the renal arteries. In the remaining cases, struts crossed one renal artery in 60% of cases (19 patients) and two renal arteries in 34% of cases (11 patients). The renal volume decrease was not correlated with the presence of stent wire struts, crossing a renal artery.
CONCLUSIONS: Stent graft with suprarenal fixation seems not to be correlated with renal volume deterioration. A randomized clinical trial with a higher effective and longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of SRF on renal function.