DOI 10.1097/mao.0000000000002101
Long-term Vertigo Control and Vestibular Function After Low-dose On-demand Transtympanic Gentamicin for Refractory Menière's Disease.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To describe the long-term clinical vertigo control along with measured lateral canal vestibular function in patients with unilateral refractory Menière's disease (MD) treated with gentamicin transtympanic injections (TTI).
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective analytic study.
SETTING
Tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS: Thirty-eight patients treated by TTI for medically refractory unilateral MD, defined by the 1995 AAO-HNS criteria, between May 2006 and December 2012.
INTERVENTION(S): One-year course of treatment with gentamicin TTI following a low dose on-demand protocol. TTI were repeated in new courses of treatment when MD recurrence occurred.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): AAO-HNS class of control, caloric tests (CalT), recurrence rate.
RESULTS
After an average clinical follow-up of 71 months, all patients entered a class of control A (78%) or B (22%), with an average of 2.3 TTI received. The mean maximal obtained deficit was 88.5%, and the mean long-term deficit was 85.5%. Ten (26%) patients had disease recurrence requiring a new course of treatment. A value of the first CalT in the 3 months following the first TTI strictly higher than 78% was significantly associated with disease control and the absence of symptom recurrence (p≤0.01). In the "recurrence" group, four patients had a significantly lower mean value of all CalT performed after the first TTI when compared with other patients (p≤0.001), indicating gentamicin resistance
CONCLUSION
: Achieving a sustainable vestibular deficit on caloric testing is key for MD symptom control after gentamicin TTI. Gentamicin resistance must be diagnosed early to adapt therapeutic strategies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.