Respiratory medicine · 2013
Does using pressure-controlled ventilation to rest respiratory muscles improve sleep in ICU patients?
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Andréjak Claire, Monconduit Julien, Rose Dominique, Toublanc Bénédicte, Mayeux Isabelle, Rodenstein Daniel, Jounieaux Vincent
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Sleep is commonly altered in critically ill patients. Ventilatory mode may impact on quality of sleep. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect on sleep of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) to spontaneous ventilation with 6 cm H2O inspiratory pressure (low-PSV).
METHODS: Thirty-five patients intubated and mechanically ventilated for acute-on-chronic respiratory failure were included in this prospective randomized cross-over study. Nine were discarded, 13 received PCV first (10 p.m.-2 a.m.) and then low-PSV (2-6 a.m.) and 13 patients received low-PSV first and then PCV.
RESULTS: Sleep architecture was altered (50.4% of the night was spent in wakefulness). PCV was associated with significantly improved sleep quality and quantity compared to low-PSV: sleep efficiency (total sleep time/total recording time) was 63% (range: 9-100) vs. 37% (0-96; p = 0.0002), stage 2 NREM sleep was 33% vs. 13% (p = 0.0005), stages 3 and 4 NREM sleep were 9% vs. 3.5% (p = 0.003) and REM sleep was 6.5% vs. 0% (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quantity and quality were significantly improved with PCV compared to low-PSV. Nocturnal respiratory muscles rest through PCV is recommended to improve sleep in ICU patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients intubated and mechanically ventilated for acute-on-chronic respiratory failure were included in this prospective randomized cross-over study. Nine were discarded, 13 received PCV first (10 p.m.-2 a.m.) and then low-PSV (2-6 a.m.) and 13 patients received low-PSV first and then PCV.
RESULTS: Sleep architecture was altered (50.4% of the night was spent in wakefulness). PCV was associated with significantly improved sleep quality and quantity compared to low-PSV: sleep efficiency (total sleep time/total recording time) was 63% (range: 9-100) vs. 37% (0-96; p = 0.0002), stage 2 NREM sleep was 33% vs. 13% (p = 0.0005), stages 3 and 4 NREM sleep were 9% vs. 3.5% (p = 0.003) and REM sleep was 6.5% vs. 0% (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Sleep quantity and quality were significantly improved with PCV compared to low-PSV. Nocturnal respiratory muscles rest through PCV is recommended to improve sleep in ICU patients with acute-on-chronic respiratory failure.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCritical CareCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodForced Expiratory VolumeHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedMuscle RelaxationPolysomnographyPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory InsufficiencyRespiratory MusclesSleep StagesSleep Wake DisordersVentilator WeaningVital Capacity