MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/cjn.2025.10449

Медицинская библиотека · The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2025

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Efgartigimod vs Chronic Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis in Canada.

Siddiqi Zaeem A, Qi Cynthia Z, Zhou Allen, Kaprielian Roger, Locklin Jason, Garcia David, Hughes Tom, Genge Angela

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a chronic neuromuscular disease that causes muscle weakness and fatigue, severely impairing quality of life. Efgartigimod is a novel drug that is recently approved for treatment of acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) gMG patients in Canada. In clinical practice, it is expected to be used in AChR-Ab+ gMG patients who continue to experience symptoms despite conventional therapy and primarily replace chronic immunoglobulins.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to estimate costs and benefits (measured as quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) of efgartigimod and chronic immunoglobulins for AChR-Ab+ gMG patients. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Canadian publicly funded healthcare system over a lifetime horizon. The model comprised six health states based on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores: MG-ADL < 5, MG-ADL 5-7, MG-ADL 8-9, MG-ADL ≥ 10, myasthenic crisis or death. Health state transition probabilities were estimated from the ADAPT and ADAPT+ studies, plus a network meta-analysis that compared efgartigimod against chronic immunoglobulins. The MyRealWorld MG study informed utility values. Modeled costs included treatment and administration, disease monitoring, complications from chronic corticosteroid use, exacerbation/crisis management, adverse events and end-of-life care.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, efgartigimod and chronic immunoglobulins were predicted to have total discounted QALYs of 16.80 and 13.35 and total discounted costs of $1,913,294 and $2,170,315, respectively. Efgartigimod dominated chronic immunoglobulins with incremental QALYs of 3.45 and cost savings of $257,020.

CONCLUSIONS

Efgartigimod provides greater benefit in terms of lower costs than chronic immunoglobulins for AChR-Ab+ gMG patients in Canada.

Для цитирования: Siddiqi Zaeem A, Qi Cynthia Z, Zhou Allen, Kaprielian Roger, Locklin Jason, Garcia David, Hughes Tom, Genge Angela. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Efgartigimod vs Chronic Immunoglobulin for the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis in Canada.. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 2025. DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2025.10449.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.