Journal of cardiography · 1983
[Phase analysis of mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse: comparison of pulsed Doppler echocardiography with phonocardiography].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamamoto M, Fukuda N, Asai M, Ohshima C, Kusaka Y, Tominaga T, Ishimoto T, Oki T, Niki T, Mori H
Аннотация
The clinical implication of the timing of mitral regurgitation (MR) in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) was investigated by comparison of the phonocardiographic patterns of the regurgitant murmur with either prolapsing phase of the mitral valve determined by two-dimensional echocardiography (TDE) or regurgitant flow patterns by pulsed Doppler echocardiography (PDE). A total of 23 patients (pts) with MVP was classified into five subsets on the basis of the phonocardiographic findings: six pts with a pansystolic murmur, seven with a late systolic murmur, two with an early systolic murmur, three with only a click(s) and five with a angiotensin II-induced regurgitant murmur (provocative MR). A comparative study between the regurgitant murmur and regurgitant flow patterns was also made in 10 pts with MR due to other etiology (four pts of rheumatic MR, three of ruptured chordae tendineae and three of papillary muscle dysfunction). MR was detected at or just above the mitral orifice using a combined system of the PDE and TDE from a transcutaneous approach. The results obtained were as follows: Phase of MR detected by PDE coincided well in timing with a regurgitant murmur recorded on the phonocardiogram (PCG) except one patient. In four of five pts with provocative MR, abnormal Doppler signals indicating MR were detected even at rest and these coincided temporally with a newly developed regurgitant murmur by provocation. Phase of MR detected by PDE was not synchronous with prolapse of the mitral leaflets examined by TDE in five out of 23 pts, suggesting that MR does not necessarily occur in accordance with mitral prolapse. Regurgitant flow patterns examined by PDE in 30 pts including 10 pts of MR due to other etiology were either a widely dispersed dot pattern or a narrow banded reverse flow pattern. Pts with a loud systolic regurgitant murmur (Levine 3/6 or greater) tended to show a widely dispersed dot pattern, and pts with a soft systolic regurgitant murmur (less than Levine 2/6) showed a narrow banded reverse flow pattern. In conclusion, PDE seems to be more sensitive than PCG for the detection of MR in MVP, and PDE may serve to the qualitative as well as quantitative evaluation of MR in MVP.