Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2021
Retrospective study of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for Japanese patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kobayashi Noritoshi, Wild Damian, Kaul Felix, Shimamura Takeshi, Takano Shoko, Takeda Yuma, Okubo Naoki, Suzuki Akihiro, Tokuhisa Motohiko, Ichikawa Yasushi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs is an innovative treatment for advanced somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PRRT cannot be performed in Japan because there is no approval or insurance cover so far.
METHODS: We relied on foreign institutions to perform PRRT for Japanese patients with NETs. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of PRRT. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed well-differentiated NET and visible tumor uptake on pre-therapeutic somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was used as the standard treatment, and patients received three infusions every 8 weeks. Until the end of 2017, combination treatment with 90 Y and 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was performed using the same protocol.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluated, and the primary lesions were pancreas, rectum, small intestine, stomach, and other locations. The partial response rate was 42.9%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months and overall survival was 42.8 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between front-line and late-line PRRT (11.0 months vs 28.0 months; P = .383). Severe adverse events included lymphocytopenia (20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in one case.
CONCLUSION: PRRT was effective and safe for Japanese patients with advanced NETs. PRRT was equally effective as front-line and late-line treatment.
METHODS: We relied on foreign institutions to perform PRRT for Japanese patients with NETs. We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of PRRT. The inclusion criteria were pathologically confirmed well-differentiated NET and visible tumor uptake on pre-therapeutic somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was used as the standard treatment, and patients received three infusions every 8 weeks. Until the end of 2017, combination treatment with 90 Y and 177 Lu-DOTA-TOC was performed using the same protocol.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were evaluated, and the primary lesions were pancreas, rectum, small intestine, stomach, and other locations. The partial response rate was 42.9%. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months and overall survival was 42.8 months. There was no significant difference in PFS between front-line and late-line PRRT (11.0 months vs 28.0 months; P = .383). Severe adverse events included lymphocytopenia (20.0%) and thrombocytopenia (5.7%). Myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in one case.
CONCLUSION: PRRT was effective and safe for Japanese patients with advanced NETs. PRRT was equally effective as front-line and late-line treatment.