DOI 10.1016/j.cellimm.2025.104956
The real-world impact of corticosteroid-associated adverse events in myasthenia gravis: A patient-reported survey analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Corticosteroids are crucial for managing acute exacerbation symptoms and preventing relapses in myasthenia gravis (MG) patients.
METHODS
Between April 15-30, 2024, 2368 online self - report questionnaires were distributed. Eventually, 444 MG patients who had received corticosteroid therapy completed the survey.
RESULTS
Self-reported adverse events (AEs) were observed in 97.5 % of the respondents. Among them, 72.5 % (322 patients) reported experiencing more than four AEs. The quality of life (QOL) of patients with MG was significantly impacted, with average MG-QOL scores of 18.07 ± 12.03. Patients with a cumulative dosage exceeding 20 g experienced the highest incidence of various AEs compared to those with lower cumulative dosages (5-20 g and less than 5 g). Additionally, a longer duration of corticosteroid exposure was associated with a higher reported incidence of AEs. Cox risk regression modeling revealed that a longer disease course, a history of myasthenic crisis, and the average daily dose of steroids (exceeding 5 mg/d), were independent predictors of corticosteroid-associated AEs. The study revealed in a single MG center, the awareness of these AEs was low among Chinese patients.
CONCLUSION
This study systematically assessed the incidence and risk factors of corticosteroid-related AEs in Chinese MG patients. The study found that the occurrence of AEs was associated with the cumulative dosage and duration of corticosteroid use. Additionally, long disease duration, a history of myasthenic crises, and an average daily dosage exceeding 5 mg/d are identified as risk factors for corticosteroid-related AEs in patients with MG.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.