The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2013
Treatment of male genital lichen sclerosus with clobetasol propionate and maintenance with either methylprednisolone aceponate or tacrolimus: a retrospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kyriakou Aikaterini, Patsialas Christos, Patsatsi Aikaterini, Sotiriadis Dimitrios
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream in male patients suffering from genital lichen sclerosus (GLS), as well as the efficacy of methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as maintenance therapy.
METHODS: The study was conducted retrospectively. At baseline, male patients with GLS (n = 41) were treated with clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream applied twice daily for 8 weeks. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pruritus, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were recorded at baseline, week 8 and week 20. At week 8, patients responsive to treatment (n = 37) were further treated with methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream twice weekly (n = 17) or tacrolimus 0.1% ointment once daily (n = 20), as maintenance therapy until week 20.
RESULTS: VAS, IGA and DLQI median scores were significantly decreased from baseline to week 8 (p < 0.001). At week 20, patients treated with methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream presented no significant difference in median IGA score (p = 0.865), median DLQI score (p = 0.853) or median VAS score (p = 0.474) compared with patients treated with tacrolimus 0.1% ointment.
CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream is effective as first-line treatment in male GLS. The data suggest that there is no difference between methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in preventing the relapses.
METHODS: The study was conducted retrospectively. At baseline, male patients with GLS (n = 41) were treated with clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream applied twice daily for 8 weeks. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pruritus, Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were recorded at baseline, week 8 and week 20. At week 8, patients responsive to treatment (n = 37) were further treated with methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream twice weekly (n = 17) or tacrolimus 0.1% ointment once daily (n = 20), as maintenance therapy until week 20.
RESULTS: VAS, IGA and DLQI median scores were significantly decreased from baseline to week 8 (p < 0.001). At week 20, patients treated with methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream presented no significant difference in median IGA score (p = 0.865), median DLQI score (p = 0.853) or median VAS score (p = 0.474) compared with patients treated with tacrolimus 0.1% ointment.
CONCLUSIONS: Clobetasol propionate 0.05% cream is effective as first-line treatment in male GLS. The data suggest that there is no difference between methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream and tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in preventing the relapses.