m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Chronic respiratory disease · 2026

Diagnostic performance of FEV1/FEV6 in detecting airway obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Du Dongru, He Sike, Qin Jiangyue, Wang Hao, Gao Lijuan, Chen Mei, Li Xiaohua, Chen Zhenni, Luo Fengming, Shen Yongchun

Аннотация

BackgroundAlthough the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC is the gold standard for diagnosing COPD, it is not easily obtainable due to various reasons. This study aims to investigate whether FEV1/FEV6 may serve as an easily accessible surrogate for FEV1/FVC in detecting airway obstruction and COPD.MethodsEligible articles were screened from PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was applied for quality assessment. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating curve were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FEV1/FEV6 in detecting airway obstruction and COPD and to determine the optimal cutoff value. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore the source of heterogeneity.ResultsWith 28 eligible articles and 65,744 subjects, the FEV1/FEV6 ratio showed good diagnostic performance in detecting both airway obstruction (sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.94, AUC 0.95) and COPD (sensitivity: 0.83, specificity: 0.88, AUC 0.91). Further analyses of the optimal cutoff value suggested that an FEV1/FEV6<0.72 was the best criterion for detecting airway obstruction (sensitivity: 0.84, specificity: 0.97, AUC 0.96), whereas an FEV1/FEV6<0.74 was the best criterion for detecting COPD (sensitivity: 0.87, specificity: 0.89, AUC 0.93). The results of subgroup analyses and meta-regression suggested that study design and geographical location may affect the heterogeneity of both sensitivity and specificity in detecting airway obstruction and COPD.ConclusionThe FEV1/FEV6 may serve as an easily accessible alternative in detecting airway obstruction and COPD. However, application of FEV1/FEV6 may also be constrained by availability and affordability of devices. Further studies are required to determine the best-suited population for FEV1/FEV6 application.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты