The Journal of pediatrics · 2025
Discharge Strategies Following Successful Ileocolic Intussusception Reduction: Hospitalization vs Emergency Department Observation.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cohen Daniel M, Helwig Sara, Poonai Naveen, Mistry Rakesh D, Mintegi Santiago, Craig Simon, Roland Damian, Shavit Itai, Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN) PAINT Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare discharge strategies following successful ileocolic intussusception (ICI) reduction: inpatient hospitalization vs emergency department (ED) observation/discharge.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned secondary analysis of children ages 4 months to 4 years with successful ICI from 86 pediatric centers in 14 countries between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. We evaluated associations between discharge strategy for outpatient recurrent ICI (re-ICI). The primary outcome was ED return for re-ICI <48 hours and the secondary within the study period.
RESULTS: We analyzed 2686 cases of ICI; 1588 (59%) admitted to hospital and 1098 (41%) discharged from ED with median (IQR) age of 18 (9, 28) months. During the study period 238 (8.9%) returned to the ED for ICI; 10.2% (112/1098) were discharged from the ED and 7.9% (126/1588) after inpatient hospitalization. Among these 238 patients, 66 (2.5%) returned <48 h most of whom had been discharged directly from the ED with a higher odds of a return visit <48 hours compared with those admitted (odds ratio [OR] = 4.27, CI = 2.50, 7.68; adjusted OR = 3.43, CI = 1.72, 7.29), and increased odds of returning within the study period (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.01, 1.72; adjusted OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.03, 2.13). Upon return, the ICI re-reduction success rate was equally high in each group, ranging from 83.9% to 94.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Few children return to the ED with outpatient recurrent ICI, following successful reduction. Although the odds of return <48 hours due to re-ICI appear higher among patients discharged from the ED vs hospitalized, both groups have equally high rates of successful re-reduction. These findings suggest that clinicians should holistically weigh the risks and benefits, taking individual circumstances into account, to help reduce unnecessary hospitalizations.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a planned secondary analysis of children ages 4 months to 4 years with successful ICI from 86 pediatric centers in 14 countries between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019. We evaluated associations between discharge strategy for outpatient recurrent ICI (re-ICI). The primary outcome was ED return for re-ICI <48 hours and the secondary within the study period.
RESULTS: We analyzed 2686 cases of ICI; 1588 (59%) admitted to hospital and 1098 (41%) discharged from ED with median (IQR) age of 18 (9, 28) months. During the study period 238 (8.9%) returned to the ED for ICI; 10.2% (112/1098) were discharged from the ED and 7.9% (126/1588) after inpatient hospitalization. Among these 238 patients, 66 (2.5%) returned <48 h most of whom had been discharged directly from the ED with a higher odds of a return visit <48 hours compared with those admitted (odds ratio [OR] = 4.27, CI = 2.50, 7.68; adjusted OR = 3.43, CI = 1.72, 7.29), and increased odds of returning within the study period (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.01, 1.72; adjusted OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.03, 2.13). Upon return, the ICI re-reduction success rate was equally high in each group, ranging from 83.9% to 94.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Few children return to the ED with outpatient recurrent ICI, following successful reduction. Although the odds of return <48 hours due to re-ICI appear higher among patients discharged from the ED vs hospitalized, both groups have equally high rates of successful re-reduction. These findings suggest that clinicians should holistically weigh the risks and benefits, taking individual circumstances into account, to help reduce unnecessary hospitalizations.