MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0970-0358.155267

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2015

A review of 48 patients after bear attacks in Central India: Demographics, management and outcomes.

Patil Surendra B, Mody Nikunj B, Kale Satish M, Ingole Sonali D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Bear attacks though relatively rare are frequent enough to be of concern for those who are in bear habitats. Our centre at Nagpur, being surrounded by dense forests from all the sides, treats a large number of victims.

AIM: The aim was to document the injuries, management and the potential complications of bear attacks.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 48 consecutive patients who were treated in our department from January 2006 to December 2013 for bear attacks.

OUTCOME: The majority of patients were referred 24-48 h post-attack. All but two patients had involvement of either the face or scalp. Involvement of eyes, mandible, facial nerve, was common. Reconstruction included simple suture of lacerations to management of complex compound injuries with three-dimensional defects. Thirteen patients developed infection.

CONCLUSION

Bear attack victims need a multidisciplinary approach. Early broad spectrum antibiotics, anti-rabies prophylaxis and irrigation and debridement of the wound are needed. We advise early referral to tertiary treatment centres.

Для цитирования: Patil Surendra B, Mody Nikunj B, Kale Satish M, Ingole Sonali D. A review of 48 patients after bear attacks in Central India: Demographics, management and outcomes.. Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2015. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.155267.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.