MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/674398

Медицинская библиотека · Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2013

Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.

Wallis Marianne C, McGrail Matthew, Webster Joan, Marsh Nicole, Gowardman John, Playford E Geoffrey, Rickard Claire M

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relative importance of independent risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis from a randomized controlled trial of PIVC dwell time. The Prentice, Williams, and Peterson statistical model was used to identify and compare risk factors for phlebitis, occlusion, and accidental removal.

SETTING

Three acute care hospitals in Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

The trial included 3,283 adult medical and surgical patients (5,907 catheters) with a PIVC with greater than 4 days of expected use.

RESULTS

Modifiable risk factors for occlusion included hand, antecubital fossa, or upper arm insertion compared with forearm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28-1.68], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.08-1.49], and 1.25 [95% CI, 1.04-1.50], respectively); and for phlebitis, larger diameter PIVC (HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.08-2.03]). PIVCs inserted by the operating and radiology suite staff had lower occlusion risk than ward insertions (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.94]). Modifiable risks for accidental removal included hand or antecubital fossa insertion compared with forearm (HR, 2.45 [95% CI, 1.93-3.10] and 1.65 [95% CI, 1.23-2.22], respectively), clinical staff insertion compared with intravenous service (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.30-2.20]); and smaller PIVC diameter (HR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.02-1.61]). Female sex was a nonmodifiable factor associated with an increased risk of both phlebitis (HR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.28-2.09]) and occlusion (HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.30-1.61]).

CONCLUSIONS

PIVC survival is improved by preferential forearm insertion, selection of appropriate PIVC diameter, and insertion by intravenous teams and other specialists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original randomized controlled trial on which this secondary analysis is based is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12608000445370).

Для цитирования: Wallis Marianne C, McGrail Matthew, Webster Joan, Marsh Nicole, Gowardman John, Playford E Geoffrey, Rickard Claire M. Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter failure: a multivariate analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial.. Infection control and hospital epidemiology. 2013. DOI: 10.1086/674398.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.