MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034764

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2020

Implementing a hybrid cognitive-behavioural therapy for pain-related insomnia in primary care: lessons learnt from a mixed-methods feasibility study.

Tang Nicole K Y, Moore Corran, Parsons Helen, Sandhu Harbinder Kaur, Patel Shilpa, Ellard David R, Nichols Vivien P, Madan Jason, Collard Victoria Elizabeth Janet, Sharma Uma, Underwood Martin

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To test the feasibility of implementing a brief but intensive hybrid cognitive behavioural therapy (Hybrid CBT) for pain-related insomnia.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods, with qualitative process evaluation on a two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial.

SETTING

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five adult patients with chronic pain and insomnia.

INTERVENTION: Hybrid CBT or self-help control intervention.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes measures were the Insomnia Severity Index and interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary outcomes measures were the present pain intensity rating from the BPI, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and EQ-5D-5L.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants were randomised to receive Hybrid CBT, 11 to receive the self-help control treatment. Of the 14 in the Hybrid CBT group, 9 (64%) completed all four treatment sessions (4 discontinued due to poor health; 1 due to time constraints). Adherence to the self-help control treatment was not monitored. The total number of participants completing the 12-week and 24-week follow-ups were 12 (6 in each group; Hybrid CBT: 43%; self-help: 55%) and 10 (5 in each group; Hybrid CBT: 36%; self-help: 45%). Based on the data available, candidate outcome measures appeared to be sensitive to changes associated with interventions. Thematic analysis of pre-postintervention interview data revealed satisfaction with treatment content among those who completed the Hybrid CBT, whereas those in the self-help control treatment wanted more contact hours and therapist guidance. Other practical suggestions for improvement included shortening the duration of each treatment session, reducing the amount of assessment paperwork, and minimising the burden of sleep and pain monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Important lessons were learnt with regard to the infrastructure required to achieve better patient adherence and retention. Based on the qualitative feedback provided by a subset of treatment completers, future trials should also consider lowering the intensity of treatment and streamlining the data collection procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17294365.

Для цитирования: Tang Nicole K Y, Moore Corran, Parsons Helen, Sandhu Harbinder Kaur, Patel Shilpa, Ellard David R, Nichols Vivien P, Madan Jason, Collard Victoria Elizabeth Janet, Sharma Uma, Underwood Martin. Implementing a hybrid cognitive-behavioural therapy for pain-related insomnia in primary care: lessons learnt from a mixed-methods feasibility study.. BMJ open. 2020. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034764.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.