European journal of ophthalmology · 2023
Boston Keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) without contact lens wearing in end-stage corneal disease: The APEC experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Wit-Carter Guillermo, Hernández-Chavarría César, Navarro-Naranjo Pedro-Ivan, Manzanillo-Rosario Cristal, Navarro-Saucedo Ricardo, García-Albisua Ana Mercedes, Hernandez-Quintela Everardo, Cabrera-Martínez Emmanuel, Ordoñez-Ranz Gabriela, Sanchez-Huerta Valeria
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the visual outcomes and survival analysis of keratoprosthesis without contact lens wearing in a tertiary eye care hospital in Mexico City, Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera (APEC, Coyoacán, México).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with survival analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three eyes (22 patients) received KPro type 1 between 2015 and 2020 with a follow-up time of three years.
METHODS: We included analyzed data about past medical history, preoperative diagnosis, best-spectacle visual acuity (BSCVA), postoperative complications and retention rate. Univariate, bivariate and survival analysis were performed and reported.
RESULTS: The mean age was 58 ± 13.5 years (SD). 60.86% were male patients (14 eyes). Twelve-eyes (52%) achieved a BSCVA of 20/200 or better in the first and second year of follow-up. At 3 years, only 35% achieved 20/200 or better (BSCVA). Retention rate of Boston type 1 KPro was 87% (20 eyes) at 3 years follow-up. The most common complication was retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) which occurred in 9 eyes (39.1%), followed by corneal melting in 7 eyes (30.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: We report the results of a retrospective cohort of twenty-three eyes (22 patients) who were implanted with a Boston type 1 KPro without contact lens wearing to treat corneal blindness. BSCVA improved significantly in most patients achieving 20/200 or better at the 2-year follow-up. Retention rate was 87%, with the presence of RPM as the most common complication.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with survival analysis.
PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three eyes (22 patients) received KPro type 1 between 2015 and 2020 with a follow-up time of three years.
METHODS: We included analyzed data about past medical history, preoperative diagnosis, best-spectacle visual acuity (BSCVA), postoperative complications and retention rate. Univariate, bivariate and survival analysis were performed and reported.
RESULTS: The mean age was 58 ± 13.5 years (SD). 60.86% were male patients (14 eyes). Twelve-eyes (52%) achieved a BSCVA of 20/200 or better in the first and second year of follow-up. At 3 years, only 35% achieved 20/200 or better (BSCVA). Retention rate of Boston type 1 KPro was 87% (20 eyes) at 3 years follow-up. The most common complication was retroprosthetic membrane (RPM) which occurred in 9 eyes (39.1%), followed by corneal melting in 7 eyes (30.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: We report the results of a retrospective cohort of twenty-three eyes (22 patients) who were implanted with a Boston type 1 KPro without contact lens wearing to treat corneal blindness. BSCVA improved significantly in most patients achieving 20/200 or better at the 2-year follow-up. Retention rate was 87%, with the presence of RPM as the most common complication.