DOI 10.1007/s00417-020-04971-7
Issues of rehabilitation of the patients with symblepharon using oral mucosal autografts.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To systematize clinical variants of symblepharon and to analyze rehabilitation availability boundaries in patients with different forms of symblepharons.
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of clinical cases included 26 patients with local, subtotal, and total symblepharon (ankyloblepharon) with a normal or anophthalmic orbit. In all patients, symblepharon was operated using split- or full-thickness oral mucosal autografts and their fixation with U-shaped stitches and compression plates. Preoperatively and postoperatively, best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, extraocular motility, results of Schirmer I test, and tear break-up time with slit-lamp biomicroscopy were analyzed, as well as additional ultrasound and electrophysiological studies were performed in some cases. Follow-up period lasted from 1.5 to 6 years.
RESULTS
The proposed surgical technique using mucosal autografts in all patients allowed complete anatomical restoration of conjunctival fornices and cavity. It resulted in improvement of visual function in patients with local symblepharon, full restoration of ocular motility in patients with a presence of the eye and provided an opportunity to wear artificial eye in patients with anophthalmia. Nonetheless, loss of conjunctival Krause's and Wolfring lacrimal glands, goblet cells, meibomian glands, and limbal stem cells prevents from further optic keratoplasty in patients with total or subtotal symblepharon on potentially sighted eye.
CONCLUSION
The most difficult patients for visual rehabilitation were the ones with subtotal or total symblepharon (ankyloblepharon) on potentially sighted eye due to the loss of conjunctival goblet cells, meibomian glands, and limbal stem cells.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.