Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
MedHopQA: a disease-centred multi-hop reasoning benchmark and evaluation framework for LLM-based biomedical question answering.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Islamaj Rezarta, Leaman Robert, Chan Joey, Wan Nicholas, Jin Qiao, Xie Natalie, Wilbur John, Tian Shubo, Yeganova Lana, Lai Po-Ting, Wei Chih-Hsuan, Yang Yifan, Ge Yao, Zhu Qingqing, Wang Zhizheng, Lu Zhiyong
Аннотация
Evaluating large language models (LLMs) in the biomedical domain requires benchmarks that can distinguish genuine reasoning from pattern matching and that remain discriminative as model capabilities improve. Existing biomedical question answering (QA) benchmarks are limited in this respect: multiple-choice formats allow models to succeed by answer elimination rather than inference, and widely circulated exam-style datasets are subject to performance saturation and training data contamination. Multi-hop reasoning, i.e. the ability to integrate information across multiple sources to derive an answer, is central to clinically meaningful tasks such as diagnosis support, literature-based discovery, and hypothesis generation, yet remains underrepresented in current biomedical QA benchmarks. We present MedHopQA, a disease-centred multi-hop reasoning benchmark of 1000 expert-curated question-answer pairs introduced as a shared task at BioCreative IX. Each question requires synthesis of information across two distinct Wikipedia articles, and answers are provided in open-ended free-text format rather than as multiple-choice selections. Gold annotations are augmented with ontology-grounded synonym sets (MONDO, NCBI Gene, and NCBI Taxonomy) to support both lexical and concept-level evaluation. The dataset was constructed through a multi-stage human-AI pipeline combining structured human annotation, triage, iterative verification, and LLM-as-a-judge validation. To reduce leaderboard gaming and contamination risk, the 1000 scored questions are embedded within a publicly downloadable set of 10 000 questions, with answers withheld, on a CodaBench leaderboard. Evaluation of four frontier LLMs under a zero-shot setting (GPT-5.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and GPT-4o) reveals performance variation across answer types, with overall accuracy ranging from 66.3% to 83.4%. Performance is strongest on chemical and anatomical questions and most variable on disease and gene/protein categories, where fine-grained semantic discrimination is required. MedHopQA provides both a benchmark and a reusable framework for constructing future biomedical QA datasets that prioritize compositional reasoning, saturation resistance, and contamination mitigation as design constraints.