Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2024
Utilization of Injectable and Device-Based Treatments in Medical Dermatology: A Survey on Demographics, Conditions, and Resident Involvement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fathizadeh Sam, Richmond Alexandra, Almukhtar Rawaa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Injectable and device-based treatments are used for medical dermatologic conditions, but understanding dermatologists' practices remains limited.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines injectable and device-based treatments for medical dermatologic conditions to identify patterns and potential improvements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology members, covering practice settings, conditions treated, pricing, and resident involvement.
RESULTS: Thirty-four of 40 (85%) respondents practiced in academic teaching hospitals, primarily in urban settings. Conditions treated included acne vulgaris, alopecia, skin cancers, disorders of pigmentation, follicular disorders, gender-affirming care, birthmarks, oncodermatology, rosacea, scars, tattoos, and vascular lesions. Treatments were offered at various prices, with clinical trials and insurance used in some cases. Resident involvement ranged from 72% to 94% of cases. Respondents also reported laser usage, with 100% using lasers for treating scars, 98% for treating vascular lesions, 98% for treating rosacea, and 88% for treating disorders of pigmentation. For acne vulgaris and associated scarring, the top treatments were chemical peels (86%), lasers (83%), and mechanical modalities (48%). With gender-affirming care, respondents used lasers (100%), filler (55%), and neurotoxins (48%).
CONCLUSION: Academic dermatologists treat medical dermatologic conditions and involve residents.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines injectable and device-based treatments for medical dermatologic conditions to identify patterns and potential improvements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was distributed to Association of Academic Cosmetic Dermatology members, covering practice settings, conditions treated, pricing, and resident involvement.
RESULTS: Thirty-four of 40 (85%) respondents practiced in academic teaching hospitals, primarily in urban settings. Conditions treated included acne vulgaris, alopecia, skin cancers, disorders of pigmentation, follicular disorders, gender-affirming care, birthmarks, oncodermatology, rosacea, scars, tattoos, and vascular lesions. Treatments were offered at various prices, with clinical trials and insurance used in some cases. Resident involvement ranged from 72% to 94% of cases. Respondents also reported laser usage, with 100% using lasers for treating scars, 98% for treating vascular lesions, 98% for treating rosacea, and 88% for treating disorders of pigmentation. For acne vulgaris and associated scarring, the top treatments were chemical peels (86%), lasers (83%), and mechanical modalities (48%). With gender-affirming care, respondents used lasers (100%), filler (55%), and neurotoxins (48%).
CONCLUSION: Academic dermatologists treat medical dermatologic conditions and involve residents.