Journal of neurology · 2021
NIHSS-the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score mismatch in guiding thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deng Pan-Pan, Wu Na, Chen Xiao-Jie, Chen Feng-Ling, Xu Heng-Shi, Bao Guan-Shui
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the mismatch between the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the computed tomography (CT) findings measured by the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for predicting the functional outcome and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
METHODS: This prospective observational study includes patients with AIS who underwent CT imaging within 4.5 h of the onset of symptoms. Patients were divided into the NIHSS-ASPECTS mismatch (NAM)-positive and NAM-negative groups (group P and N, respectively). The clinical outcome was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Safety outcomes included progression, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), adverse events, clinical adverse events, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were enrolled in the study. In group P, IVT treatment was associated with a good functional outcome at 3 months (p = 0.005) and 1 year (p = 0.001). A higher percentage of patients with favorable mRS (0-2) (p = 0.01) and excellent mRS (0-1) (p = 0.011) functional outcomes was obtained at 1 year in group P with IVT treatment. Group N did not benefit from the same treatment (p = 0.352 and p = 0.480 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in sICH, ICH, mortality rates, or other risks between the IVT and conventional treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: IVT treatment is associated with a good functional outcome in patients with NAM, without increasing the risks of sICH, ICH, mortality, or other negative outcomes. NAM promises to be an easily obtained indicator for guiding the treatment decisions of AIS.
METHODS: This prospective observational study includes patients with AIS who underwent CT imaging within 4.5 h of the onset of symptoms. Patients were divided into the NIHSS-ASPECTS mismatch (NAM)-positive and NAM-negative groups (group P and N, respectively). The clinical outcome was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Safety outcomes included progression, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), adverse events, clinical adverse events, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were enrolled in the study. In group P, IVT treatment was associated with a good functional outcome at 3 months (p = 0.005) and 1 year (p = 0.001). A higher percentage of patients with favorable mRS (0-2) (p = 0.01) and excellent mRS (0-1) (p = 0.011) functional outcomes was obtained at 1 year in group P with IVT treatment. Group N did not benefit from the same treatment (p = 0.352 and p = 0.480 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in sICH, ICH, mortality rates, or other risks between the IVT and conventional treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: IVT treatment is associated with a good functional outcome in patients with NAM, without increasing the risks of sICH, ICH, mortality, or other negative outcomes. NAM promises to be an easily obtained indicator for guiding the treatment decisions of AIS.