Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2021
Prevalence and impact of HLA and MICA allele mismatching on donor-specific antibodies induction in kidney transplant rejection.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romphruk Amornrat V, Simtong Piyapong, Suntornnipat Jidpinan, Sudwilai Yupaporn, Cheunta Siriluk, Chan-On Chitranon, Leelayuwat Chanvit
Аннотация
AIM: Donor-recipient antigen mismatching for anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and MICA is one of the risk factors for antibody induction leading to graft rejection. Our aim was to analyze the incidence and specificity of the different DSAs developing and to investigate the impact of HLA and MICA allele mismatches on antibody production in kidney transplant patients experiencing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 253 consecutive recipients of kidney transplant who were diagnosed as experiencing AMR.
RESULTS: Our results showed that around 27% of our patients were positive for DSAs over a median follow-up period of 24 months. Antibody to HLA-DQ7 was the most prevalent DSA detected. The allele mismatch number was significantly lower for DQ loci than -A and -B loci (DQ vs. A, p < .001; DQ vs. B, p = .002). Considering each HLA antigen, the incidence rate of DQ-DSA [41.9 (32.92-51.46; 95%CI)] was much higher than the rate observed for DSA directed to -A, -DR and -B loci. Half of the recipients in the DQ-DSA-only group, and the DQ-DSA together with non-DQ group, had MFI > 5000. Only one case developed de novo MICA-DSA (MICA002).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that mismatching for HLA and MICA alleles leads to the development of HLA and MICA antibodies in some kidney transplant recipients. We have also demonstrated that DSA to the DQ locus is the most prevalent in kidney transplant patients with AMR. Thus, matching the DQ locus in kidney allocation algorithms may reduce post-transplant development of DSA.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 253 consecutive recipients of kidney transplant who were diagnosed as experiencing AMR.
RESULTS: Our results showed that around 27% of our patients were positive for DSAs over a median follow-up period of 24 months. Antibody to HLA-DQ7 was the most prevalent DSA detected. The allele mismatch number was significantly lower for DQ loci than -A and -B loci (DQ vs. A, p < .001; DQ vs. B, p = .002). Considering each HLA antigen, the incidence rate of DQ-DSA [41.9 (32.92-51.46; 95%CI)] was much higher than the rate observed for DSA directed to -A, -DR and -B loci. Half of the recipients in the DQ-DSA-only group, and the DQ-DSA together with non-DQ group, had MFI > 5000. Only one case developed de novo MICA-DSA (MICA002).
CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that mismatching for HLA and MICA alleles leads to the development of HLA and MICA antibodies in some kidney transplant recipients. We have also demonstrated that DSA to the DQ locus is the most prevalent in kidney transplant patients with AMR. Thus, matching the DQ locus in kidney allocation algorithms may reduce post-transplant development of DSA.