Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
Standardizing care for agitation in Alzheimer's disease, results from a randomized controlled trial of an integrated care pathway versus usual care - the StaN trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kumar Sanjeev, Burhan Amer M, Colman Sarah, Chu Li, Davies Simon, Derkach Peter, Elmi Sarah, Gerretsen Philip, Graff-Guerrero Ariel, Greenway Kyle, Hussain Maria, Ismail Zahinoor, Kim Donna, Krisman Linda, Ma Clement, Moghabghab Rola, Mulsant Benoit H, Pollock Bruce G, Rej Soham, Rostas Aviva, Schoer Nicole, Streiner David L, Van Bussel Lisa, Rajji Tarek K, StaN Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adherence to treatment guidelines for agitation in dementia is suboptimal and inconsistent. We designed and evaluated an Integrated Care Pathway (ICP) for the management of agitation in dementia.
METHODS: This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial at 12 inpatient units and long-term-care homes (LTCHs) across Canada. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the ICP or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes were Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and psychotropic polypharmacy at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: We randomized 185 participants (93 inpatients, 92 in LTCHs). For CMAI, there were no significant time-by-treatment-group interactions among inpatients (F4, 299.3 = 1.7, p = 0.14) or LTCH residents (F4, 296.0 = 0.87, p = 0.48). For polypharmacy, there were significant time-by-treatmentgroup interactions among both inpatients ( χ 7 2 = 15.3, p = 0.032) and LTCH residents ( χ 7 2 = 30.0, p < 0.001), with lower rates of polypharmacy in the ICP group at certain time points, but not at week 12.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing care for agitation in dementia may result in lesser polypharmacy without affecting efficacy. Future studies should assess the ICP in the broader community and outpatients.
METHODS: This was a double-blind randomized controlled trial at 12 inpatient units and long-term-care homes (LTCHs) across Canada. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the ICP or treatment-as-usual (TAU). Primary outcomes were Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and psychotropic polypharmacy at 12 weeks.
RESULTS: We randomized 185 participants (93 inpatients, 92 in LTCHs). For CMAI, there were no significant time-by-treatment-group interactions among inpatients (F4, 299.3 = 1.7, p = 0.14) or LTCH residents (F4, 296.0 = 0.87, p = 0.48). For polypharmacy, there were significant time-by-treatmentgroup interactions among both inpatients ( χ 7 2 = 15.3, p = 0.032) and LTCH residents ( χ 7 2 = 30.0, p < 0.001), with lower rates of polypharmacy in the ICP group at certain time points, but not at week 12.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing care for agitation in dementia may result in lesser polypharmacy without affecting efficacy. Future studies should assess the ICP in the broader community and outpatients.