MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2007

[Expression of RAD51 in carcinomas of cancer of larynx and its clinical significance].

Yao Wei, Chen Wei, Chen Shiming, Xiao Bokui, Wang Yan, Tao Zezhang

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the expression and clinical significance of RAD51 in laryngocarcinoma.

METHOD: The expression of RAD51 in laryngocarcinoma and polyp of vocal cord tissues were determined by immunohistochemical staining. The results were analyzed and compared with the clinical stage, lymph node metastasis and pathologic grade.

RESULT: (1) The expression of RAD51 in laryngocarcinoma group was extremely stronger than that in polyp of vocal cord group (P < 0.01). (2) There was significant difference for RAD51 expression in cancer cells between earlier clinical stage group and advanced clinical stage group (P < 0.01). (3) There was significant difference for RAD51 expression in different pathologic grades (P < 0.05). (4) There was also significant difference for RAD51 expression between groups with and without lymph node metastasis.

CONCLUSION

RAD51 may play a critical role in tumorigenesis of laryngocarcinoma. RAD51 may be a potential marker for clinical diagnosis and treatment of Laryngocarcinoma. It may be significant in predicting clinical stage, pathologic grade and metastasis.

Для цитирования: Yao Wei, Chen Wei, Chen Shiming, Xiao Bokui, Wang Yan, Tao Zezhang. [Expression of RAD51 in carcinomas of cancer of larynx and its clinical significance].. Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. 2007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.