Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2006
[Effects of small fenestra stapedotomy in comparison with total stapedectomy].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yan Xing, Xie Nan-ping, Lin Feng, Chen Guo-qiang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of small fenestra stapedotomy and total stapedectomy in patients with otosclerosis.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (30 ears) undergoing small fenestra stapedotomy and 36 patients (43 ears) receiving total stapedectomy were compared for hearing results and complication rates.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were seen in postoperative speech pure tone average in closing air-bone gap between the two groups. The ears treated by small fenestra stapedotomy showed statistically better air-bone gap closure at high frequencies with lower rates of sensorineural hearing loss at high frequencies and milder dizziness.
CONCLUSION: In spite of the successful hearing outcomes in both groups, small fenestra stapedotomy can achieve better results at high frequencies and reduce the incidence of complications.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (30 ears) undergoing small fenestra stapedotomy and 36 patients (43 ears) receiving total stapedectomy were compared for hearing results and complication rates.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were seen in postoperative speech pure tone average in closing air-bone gap between the two groups. The ears treated by small fenestra stapedotomy showed statistically better air-bone gap closure at high frequencies with lower rates of sensorineural hearing loss at high frequencies and milder dizziness.
CONCLUSION: In spite of the successful hearing outcomes in both groups, small fenestra stapedotomy can achieve better results at high frequencies and reduce the incidence of complications.