MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00129492-200407000-00011

Медицинская библиотека · Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2004

Stapes surgery in the United States.

Vrabec Jeffrey T, Coker Newton J

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A contemporary analysis of trends in the surgical management of otosclerosis in the United States is presented.

DATA SOURCES: U.S. population demographics were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau. Surgical case data was obtained from publications of the National Center for Health Statistics. Physician population statistics are published by the American Medical Association.

DATA EXTRACTION: Available estimates for otologic operations are interpreted according to clinical setting used for data acquisition and surgical practice patterns. Linear regression of included data defines trends in operations performed. Population statistics are used to define changes in the incidence of surgical cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of stapedectomy cases has declined over the past 30 years. During this same interval, the U.S. population (including the white population) and the number of surgeons has increased. This indicates that the incidence of surgical otosclerosis is declining. Although the true etiology of the decline is uncertain, widespread immunization for measles is a plausible hypothesis.

Для цитирования: Vrabec Jeffrey T, Coker Newton J. Stapes surgery in the United States.. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200407000-00011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.