La Tunisie medicale · 2018
Laparoscopy for perforated duodenal ulcer: A morbidity score based on a cohort study of 384 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mzoughi Zeineb, Baccouche Seiffedine, Romdhane Hayfa, Fadhl Houssem, Smati Houcem, Talbi Ghofrane, Khalfallah Mohamed Tahar
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Laparoscopic treatment of perforated ulcer is accompanied by a lesser morbidity and mortality compared with treatment by laparotomy. However, the morbidity of the laparoscopic approach is not nil (4%). It is influenced by pre and intraoperative factors. The aim of our work is to establish a morbidity score in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for acute peritonitis with perforated duodenal ulcer.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in a General Surgery Department. We included 384 cases of perforated duodenal ulcer operated laparoscopically over a fourteen-year period ranging from January 2000 to December 2014. We conducted a multivariate logistical regression analysis by step-by-step-descending method. From these independent factors we established a score using the ROC curves. The threshold with the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting morbidity was investigated. In all statistical tests, the significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: The overall morbidity rate of our patients was 3.38% (13 patients). Multivariate analysis has identified five independent morbidity risk factors: temperature higher than 37.6° C, renal failure, age> 45 years, a number of stitches of two or higher and operating time to 75 minutes or longer. Our morbidity score took into account these 5 factors by integrating the intrinsic value of each factor. The threshold of the score having the best torque sensitivity specificity to predict morbidity was 10.
CONCLUSION: A morbidity score for perforated duodenal ulcer surgery performed by laparoscopy may be useful to organize the post-operativecare of these patients usually young and active. A lower score than the threshold predictive of morbidity could allow a rapid rehabilitation of these patients and a one day hospitalization management.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted in a General Surgery Department. We included 384 cases of perforated duodenal ulcer operated laparoscopically over a fourteen-year period ranging from January 2000 to December 2014. We conducted a multivariate logistical regression analysis by step-by-step-descending method. From these independent factors we established a score using the ROC curves. The threshold with the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting morbidity was investigated. In all statistical tests, the significance level was set at 0.05.
RESULTS: The overall morbidity rate of our patients was 3.38% (13 patients). Multivariate analysis has identified five independent morbidity risk factors: temperature higher than 37.6° C, renal failure, age> 45 years, a number of stitches of two or higher and operating time to 75 minutes or longer. Our morbidity score took into account these 5 factors by integrating the intrinsic value of each factor. The threshold of the score having the best torque sensitivity specificity to predict morbidity was 10.
CONCLUSION: A morbidity score for perforated duodenal ulcer surgery performed by laparoscopy may be useful to organize the post-operativecare of these patients usually young and active. A lower score than the threshold predictive of morbidity could allow a rapid rehabilitation of these patients and a one day hospitalization management.