A combination of smears and cell block preparations provides high diagnostic accuracy for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration has demonstrated its accuracy in the diagnostic workup of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. In addition to conventional smears, the use of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and cell block preparations (CBP) has been introduced more recently. The aim of our study was to determine the performance of each of the different techniques, separately and combined, in terms of diagnostic yield and sensitivity. A total of 290 consecutive patients were included. The pathological examination was based on smear cytology, LBC, and CBP. Adequate sampling was defined by the presence of pathological material or lymphocytes. The global diagnostic yield was 82.7 % and the sensitivity was 89.1 %. The diagnostic yield was 72.8 % for smears, 78.8 % for LBC, and 69.9 % for CBP. The combination of smears with CBP significantly increased diagnostic yield (p = 0.01) and sensitivity (p = 0.006), but not the combination of smears with LBC (yield: p = 0.07; sensitivity: p = 0.13). The combination of the three techniques further increased yield (p = 0.007) and sensitivity (p = 0.006), compared with smears alone. CBP were more sensitive than smears for both diagnoses of carcinoma (p = 0.01) and granulomatous inflammation (p = 0.048). Conversely, LBC was less sensitive than smears for granulomatous inflammation (p = 0.004), but the difference was not significant for carcinoma (p = 0.42). CBP, as a complement to smears, increases diagnostic yield and sensitivity for both diagnoses of carcinoma and granulomatous inflammation. LBC, if used alone, increases the risk of a false-negative result.