Contraception · 2025
Effect of contraceptive methods on the vaginal microbiome and host immune factors.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Serrano Myrna G, Edwards David, Ahmed Khatija, Bailey Veronique C, Beksinska Mags, Edupuganti Laahirie, Harryparsad Rushil, D'Hellencourt Florence L, Meyer Bahiah, Mehou-Loko Celia, Radzey Nina, Taku Ongeziwe, Williamson Anna-Lise, Smit Jennifer, Spaine Katherine, Zhu Bin, Jefferson Kimberly K, Nanda Kavita, Strauss Iii Jerome F, Morrison Charles S, Deese Jennifer, Masson Lindi, Buck Gregory A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess alterations in vaginal microbiota and immune markers over the first 3 months following initiation of copper intrauterine device (copper IUD), levonorgestrel (LNG) implant, and intramuscular depot medroxyprogestone acetate (DMPA-IM).
STUDY DESIGN: We included 162 participants from the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which enrolled healthy, HIV-negative women seeking contraception and randomized them to a copper IUD, LNG implant, or DMPA-IM. Microbiome and immune profiles in vaginal swab samples collected at enrollment, 1 month and 3 months were analyzed. We categorized microbiome profiles as ''optimal'', ''intermediate'', or ''non-optimal'' based on established criteria [1]. We compared microbiome and immune markers across contraceptive groups and evaluated changes to 1 and 3 months.
RESULTS: Copper IUD users had a more diverse vaginal microbiome and generally increased inflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides over the 3-month follow-up, compared to LNG-implant and DMPA-IM users [2]. LNG-implant users had less complex vaginal microbiomes with reduced inflammation, while DMPA-IM showed little change in either microbiome composition or inflammatory markers. Copper IUD users exhibited lower microbiome stability and a higher likelihood of transitioning to less optimal profiles. In contrast, LNG-implant users showed greater stability and a higher probability of transition to optimal microbiome and immune marker profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive methods affect the vaginal microbiome differently. Copper IUD use may lead to less favorable profiles and increased levels of some immune markers, indicating potential adverse health effects. Conversely, LNG-implant usage promotes a more favorable microbiome and immune marker balance.
IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that copper IUDs are associated with decreased prevalence of Lactobacillus-dominated microbiomes, higher transition rates towards less optimal microbiome and increased inflammatory profiles, which may lead to negative implications for gynecologic and reproductive health, the LNG-implant may offer positive health benefits with increased prevalence of L. crispatus-dominated microbiomes.
STUDY DESIGN: We included 162 participants from the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial, which enrolled healthy, HIV-negative women seeking contraception and randomized them to a copper IUD, LNG implant, or DMPA-IM. Microbiome and immune profiles in vaginal swab samples collected at enrollment, 1 month and 3 months were analyzed. We categorized microbiome profiles as ''optimal'', ''intermediate'', or ''non-optimal'' based on established criteria [1]. We compared microbiome and immune markers across contraceptive groups and evaluated changes to 1 and 3 months.
RESULTS: Copper IUD users had a more diverse vaginal microbiome and generally increased inflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides over the 3-month follow-up, compared to LNG-implant and DMPA-IM users [2]. LNG-implant users had less complex vaginal microbiomes with reduced inflammation, while DMPA-IM showed little change in either microbiome composition or inflammatory markers. Copper IUD users exhibited lower microbiome stability and a higher likelihood of transitioning to less optimal profiles. In contrast, LNG-implant users showed greater stability and a higher probability of transition to optimal microbiome and immune marker profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive methods affect the vaginal microbiome differently. Copper IUD use may lead to less favorable profiles and increased levels of some immune markers, indicating potential adverse health effects. Conversely, LNG-implant usage promotes a more favorable microbiome and immune marker balance.
IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that copper IUDs are associated with decreased prevalence of Lactobacillus-dominated microbiomes, higher transition rates towards less optimal microbiome and increased inflammatory profiles, which may lead to negative implications for gynecologic and reproductive health, the LNG-implant may offer positive health benefits with increased prevalence of L. crispatus-dominated microbiomes.