Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia) · 2011
[The prevalence of Demodex folliculorum infection in patients attending a general ophthalmological consultation].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Galvis-Ramírez Virgilio, Tello-Hernández Alejandro, Álvarez-Osorio Leonardo, Rey-Serrano Juan J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Determining Demodex folliculorum infection prevalence in patients attending general ophthalmological consultation and such infection's association with blepharitis.
METHODS: This was a descriptive study of such prevalence. 128 subjects who attended the Virgilio Galvis Eye Centre were randomly selected and the presence of D. folliculorum was determined in 4 eyelashes taken from each of them.
RESULTS: D. folliculorum infection prevalence was 42.1% (n=54); blepharitis was diagnosed in 38.3% of the patients (n=49) and 63.2% of them (n=31) were positive for D. folliculorum. Only 29.2% of the individuals in the group without blepharitis (n=79) had mites (n=23) (p=0.0003). A higher number of parasites was found in patients with blepharitis (12.7 parasitic load index cf 5.1; p=0.0001); 25% (n=32) of the participants had scaling in the form of cylinders and 96.9% of these had the mites (n=31), whereas the mite was only present in 24% (n=23) of subjects who had no cylinder-type scaling (n=96).
CONCLUSIONS: Demodex folliculorum is a parasite found in people without ocular lesions; however, it is more frequent and has a higher parasite burden in patients with blepharitis. Our results suggested the need for investigating the presence of D. folliculorum in all patients suffering from blepharitis, especially in cases where cylinder-type scaling has been observed in their eyelashes.
METHODS: This was a descriptive study of such prevalence. 128 subjects who attended the Virgilio Galvis Eye Centre were randomly selected and the presence of D. folliculorum was determined in 4 eyelashes taken from each of them.
RESULTS: D. folliculorum infection prevalence was 42.1% (n=54); blepharitis was diagnosed in 38.3% of the patients (n=49) and 63.2% of them (n=31) were positive for D. folliculorum. Only 29.2% of the individuals in the group without blepharitis (n=79) had mites (n=23) (p=0.0003). A higher number of parasites was found in patients with blepharitis (12.7 parasitic load index cf 5.1; p=0.0001); 25% (n=32) of the participants had scaling in the form of cylinders and 96.9% of these had the mites (n=31), whereas the mite was only present in 24% (n=23) of subjects who had no cylinder-type scaling (n=96).
CONCLUSIONS: Demodex folliculorum is a parasite found in people without ocular lesions; however, it is more frequent and has a higher parasite burden in patients with blepharitis. Our results suggested the need for investigating the presence of D. folliculorum in all patients suffering from blepharitis, especially in cases where cylinder-type scaling has been observed in their eyelashes.