The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2019
Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kreibich Maximilian, Rylski Bartosz, Czerny Martin, Pingpoh Clarence, Siepe Matthias, Beyersdorf Friedhelm, Khurshan Fabliha, Vallabhajosyula Prashanth, Szeto Wilson Y, Bavaria Joseph E, Desai Nimesh D, Branchetti Emanuela
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, aortic, and outcome characteristics of type A aortic dissection patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs) and tricuspid aortic valves (TAVs).
METHODS: Patient characteristics and radiographic, operative, and outcome data were evaluated and compared between 1068 TAV patients and 72 BAV patients operated on for type A aortic dissection in 2 centers. Predissection aortic diameters were calculated as previously reported for TAV patients.
RESULTS: BAV patients were significantly younger (P < .001) and had a lower incidence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although the clinical presentation was similar, the dissection affected the abdominal aorta significantly more often in TAV patients (P = .029). Aortic root replacements were performed significantly more often in BAV patients (P < .001). Postoperative outcome was similar between the 2 groups. BAV patients had a significantly larger maximum postdissection diameter (P < .001) and calculated predissection diameter (P < .001) compared with TAV patients. Predissection ascending aortic diameters were less than 5.5 cm in 96% of all TAV patients and less than 5.0 cm in 76% of all BAV patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissection in BAV patients is not associated with worse clinical or long-term outcome but significantly influences the proximal aortic repair. After modeling predissection aortic diameters, less than 5% of all TAV patients and possibly less than 25% of all BAV patients would meet the elective threshold for preventative replacement of the ascending aorta.
METHODS: Patient characteristics and radiographic, operative, and outcome data were evaluated and compared between 1068 TAV patients and 72 BAV patients operated on for type A aortic dissection in 2 centers. Predissection aortic diameters were calculated as previously reported for TAV patients.
RESULTS: BAV patients were significantly younger (P < .001) and had a lower incidence of cardiovascular risk factors. Although the clinical presentation was similar, the dissection affected the abdominal aorta significantly more often in TAV patients (P = .029). Aortic root replacements were performed significantly more often in BAV patients (P < .001). Postoperative outcome was similar between the 2 groups. BAV patients had a significantly larger maximum postdissection diameter (P < .001) and calculated predissection diameter (P < .001) compared with TAV patients. Predissection ascending aortic diameters were less than 5.5 cm in 96% of all TAV patients and less than 5.0 cm in 76% of all BAV patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute type A aortic dissection in BAV patients is not associated with worse clinical or long-term outcome but significantly influences the proximal aortic repair. After modeling predissection aortic diameters, less than 5% of all TAV patients and possibly less than 25% of all BAV patients would meet the elective threshold for preventative replacement of the ascending aorta.