Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024
Radiofrequency ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: An updated comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Silva Menezes Antonio, Sanches Murilo R, de Oliveira Filho Ernani, de Oliveira Elias J R, Oliveira Vinicius M R, Moraes Vitor R Y
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has emerged as a therapeutic option for surgical myectomy and alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), but its efficacy remains unclear.
AIM: Due to limited research on RFCA for HCM, there is an ongoing attempt to assess its efficacy and safety.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies assessing the efficacy outcomes for patients with HOCM who underwent RFCA. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.
RESULTS: We included 11 studies comprising 470 patients, of whom 34.6% were female. The mean patient age ranged from 43.7 to 60.7 years. During the follow-up after RFCA, there was a significant decrease in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at rest (MD -60.25 mmHg; 95% CI [-70.53;-59.14 mmHg]; p < 0.01) and during stimulation (MD -83.56 mmHg; 95% CI [-100.36;-66.76 mmHg]; p < 0.01). Moreover, RFCA reduced interventricular septum (IVS) thickness (MD -3.61 mm; 95% CI [-5.64; -1.59 mm]; p = 0.01) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (MD -1.46; 95% CI [-1.69; -1.24]; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HOCM, RFCA was associated with an improved NYHA class, reduced IVS thickness, and decreased LVOT gradient at rest and with stimulation.
AIM: Due to limited research on RFCA for HCM, there is an ongoing attempt to assess its efficacy and safety.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched for studies assessing the efficacy outcomes for patients with HOCM who underwent RFCA. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using a random-effects model and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics.
RESULTS: We included 11 studies comprising 470 patients, of whom 34.6% were female. The mean patient age ranged from 43.7 to 60.7 years. During the follow-up after RFCA, there was a significant decrease in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient at rest (MD -60.25 mmHg; 95% CI [-70.53;-59.14 mmHg]; p < 0.01) and during stimulation (MD -83.56 mmHg; 95% CI [-100.36;-66.76 mmHg]; p < 0.01). Moreover, RFCA reduced interventricular septum (IVS) thickness (MD -3.61 mm; 95% CI [-5.64; -1.59 mm]; p = 0.01) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (MD -1.46; 95% CI [-1.69; -1.24]; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HOCM, RFCA was associated with an improved NYHA class, reduced IVS thickness, and decreased LVOT gradient at rest and with stimulation.