MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/iwj.14241

Медицинская библиотека · International wound journal · 2023

Development and validation of a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring.

Wang Yanqiong, Liu Ruiqi, Wu Zhihui, Xu Xuewen, He Lingxiao

СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To develop a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring and validate its psychometric properties. This was a methodological study. Researchers developed the scale based on a literature review, qualitative study and Delphi expert consultation. Subsequently, 409 patients participated in the study to test the psychometric properties of the scale. We evaluated construct validity, content validity, internal consistency reliability, and interrater reliability. The researchers developed a scale consisting of three dimensions and 12 items. Factor analysis extracted a total of four common factors that accounted for 62.22% of the total variance. The results revealed that the item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.67 to 1, while the scale-content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.82. Internal consistency reliability: Cronbach's α of the items ranged from 0.67 to 0.76, while Cronbach's α of the whole scale was 0.74. Interrater reliability: the Kappa number was 0.73. The final scale showed adequate construct validity, content validity, and reliability. It is appropriate for use in research and clinical practice settings to identify patients with a risk of pathological scarring. Further study is needed to confirm the scale's validity and reliability in other settings and populations.

Для цитирования: Wang Yanqiong, Liu Ruiqi, Wu Zhihui, Xu Xuewen, He Lingxiao. Development and validation of a risk assessment scale for pathological scarring.. International wound journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14241.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.