Osong public health and research perspectives · 2025
A machine learning approach for predicting suicidal ideation among family members of persons with disabilities: a cross-sectional study in the Republic of Korea.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jin Hyuk
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although family members of persons with disabilities face elevated suicide risk, predictive models remain underdeveloped in Korean contexts. This study aimed to develop machine learning-based predictive models for suicidal ideation among family members of persons with disabilities and examine differential risk patterns by disability onset type.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 124,783 adult family members (59.9% spouses, 20.3% parents/ascendants, 14.6% adult children, 5.2% extended family) from the 2018 Korean Disability and Life Dynamics Panel using survey weights. Four predictive models, including machine learning approaches, were compared using 31 variables. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets, with stratified analyses comparing congenital and acquired disability groups.
RESULTS: Among the 124,783 family members analyzed, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with cross-validation achieved optimal performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.875 training; 0.853 test). LASSO selected 16 of 31 variables for the total sample, with family members' depression as the strongest predictor (β=0.554), followed by disabled persons' suicidal ideation (β=0.425). Stratified LASSO analyses revealed that national basic livelihood beneficiary status was the strongest predictor for families with congenital disability (β=0.541), while family members' depression was the strongest predictor for families with acquired disability (β=0.562), demonstrating distinct predictive patterns by disability onset.
CONCLUSION: These findings show that predictive factors differ substantially by disability onset type, indicating the need for tailored intervention approaches and offering an evidence-based foundation for targeted suicide prevention strategies.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 124,783 adult family members (59.9% spouses, 20.3% parents/ascendants, 14.6% adult children, 5.2% extended family) from the 2018 Korean Disability and Life Dynamics Panel using survey weights. Four predictive models, including machine learning approaches, were compared using 31 variables. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets, with stratified analyses comparing congenital and acquired disability groups.
RESULTS: Among the 124,783 family members analyzed, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) with cross-validation achieved optimal performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.875 training; 0.853 test). LASSO selected 16 of 31 variables for the total sample, with family members' depression as the strongest predictor (β=0.554), followed by disabled persons' suicidal ideation (β=0.425). Stratified LASSO analyses revealed that national basic livelihood beneficiary status was the strongest predictor for families with congenital disability (β=0.541), while family members' depression was the strongest predictor for families with acquired disability (β=0.562), demonstrating distinct predictive patterns by disability onset.
CONCLUSION: These findings show that predictive factors differ substantially by disability onset type, indicating the need for tailored intervention approaches and offering an evidence-based foundation for targeted suicide prevention strategies.