m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
European heart journal · 1986

Cineaortography in the assessment of aortic regurgitation: a comparison of different catheter types.

Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Kiemeneij F, Suwarganda J S, de Jong I H, Schuilenburg R M

Аннотация

The accuracy in diagnosing aortic regurgitation was studied in 170 consecutive cineaortograms. In 85 patients (group A) cineaortograms were undertaken with Sones or Gensini catheters, which produce a jet of contrast material directed towards the aortic valve. The other 85 patients (group B) underwent cineaortography with pigtail catheters, which may cause more equal distribution of contrast material in the aortic root. In group A, 31 of 71 patients (44%) without clinically known aortic valve disease showed angiographic grade I-III/IV aortic regurgitation. In group B only 8 of 61 patients (13%) without clinical evidence of aortic valve disease had grade I-II/IV aortic regurgitation on cineaortography. This difference is statistically significant (P less than 0.001). We conclude that catheters which produce a jet of contrast medium directed straight at the aortic valve can cause artificial trivial to moderate aortic regurgitation. Angiographic evaluation of aortic regurgitation should be performed with a catheter such as a pigtail or closed-end multiple sidehole catheter in which the contrast medium is not directed straight at the aortic valve.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты