Irish journal of medical science · 2002
Does prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent recurrent biliary problems in patients with gallstones and a normal cholangiogram?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johnston S D, Lim P, Collins J S A, Watson R G P, Tham T C K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is indicated in patients with confirmed bile duct stones at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The role of ES in patients with suspected bile duct stones but a normal cholangiogram, in the prevention of recurrent biliary symptoms, when cholecystectomy is not planned, is unclear.
AIM: To determine if prophylactic ES prevents further biliary problems in such patients.
METHODS: Patients were identified with gallbladder stones presenting with jaundice, abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) or dilated bile ducts on ultrasound, in whom cholecystectomy was not planned and who had a normal cholangiogram at ERCP. Patients were followed-up to determine the frequency of recurrent biliary problems or repeat investigations.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included, of whom 20 had an ES. The frequency of pre-ERCP features did not differ between the two groups. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 15-66). Post-ERCP recurrent abdominal pain (5 vs 3; p=0.39), jaundice (3 vs 1; p=0.28), pancreatitis (0 vs 1; p=0.32), and repeat ultrasound (2 vs 1; p=0.52), ERCP (1 vs 1; p=0.97) or cholecystectomy (2 vs 3, p=0.82) did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gallstones, suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones and a normal cholangiogram need not have a prophylactic sphincterotomy since there is no reduction in recurrent biliary problems and this potentially increases the morbidity.
AIM: To determine if prophylactic ES prevents further biliary problems in such patients.
METHODS: Patients were identified with gallbladder stones presenting with jaundice, abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) or dilated bile ducts on ultrasound, in whom cholecystectomy was not planned and who had a normal cholangiogram at ERCP. Patients were followed-up to determine the frequency of recurrent biliary problems or repeat investigations.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included, of whom 20 had an ES. The frequency of pre-ERCP features did not differ between the two groups. Median follow-up was 32 months (range 15-66). Post-ERCP recurrent abdominal pain (5 vs 3; p=0.39), jaundice (3 vs 1; p=0.28), pancreatitis (0 vs 1; p=0.32), and repeat ultrasound (2 vs 1; p=0.52), ERCP (1 vs 1; p=0.97) or cholecystectomy (2 vs 3, p=0.82) did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with gallstones, suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones and a normal cholangiogram need not have a prophylactic sphincterotomy since there is no reduction in recurrent biliary problems and this potentially increases the morbidity.