Journal of interventional cardiology · 2018
Impact of single-plane versus Bi-plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fang Hsiu-Yu, Wu Chiung-Jen, Lee Wei-Chieh
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of single-plane and bi-plane imaging on procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single-plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi-plane imaging.
RESULTS: A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single-plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi-plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single-plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi-plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi-plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi-plane group.
CONCLUSION: Bi-plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.
METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2015, a total of 359 patients received scheduled retrograde CTO PCI and were enrolled in the study; 119 patients underwent PCI by single-plane imaging, and another 240 patients underwent PCI by bi-plane imaging.
RESULTS: A 95.0% rate of technical success was noted in the single-plane imaging group, and a 95.8% rate of technical success was noted in the bi-plane imaging group. All patients received the CTO approach via the retrograde method, and the retrograde method success rate was 88.2% in single-plane imaging group, and 81.7% in the bi-plane imaging group. A longer procedural time (153.73 ± 53.15 vs 172.88 ± 61.30 min; P = 0.004), longer fluorescence time (71.40 ± 25.96 vs 80.95 ± 34.70 min; P = 0.008), and more contrast medium volume (342.77 ± 102.25 vs 394.58 ± 156.41 mL; P = 0.001) were noted in the bi-plane imaging group. After propensity score match, a longer procedural time, longer fluorescence time, and more contrast volume was noted in bi-plane group.
CONCLUSION: Bi-plane imaging could not decrease procedural time, fluorescence time, and contrast medium volume in retrograde CTO PCI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedChronic DiseaseContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCoronary OcclusionCoronary VesselsFemaleFluorescenceHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesRadiodermatitisRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome