MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-311

Медицинская библиотека · BMC psychiatry · 2013

Melancholic and reactive depression: a reappraisal of old categories.

Mizushima Jin, Sakurai Hitoshi, Mizuno Yuya, Shinfuku Masaki, Tani Hideaki, Yoshida Kadunari, Ozawa Chisa, Serizawa Asako, Kodashiro Natsuko, Koide Shinya, Minamisawa Atsumi, Mutsumoto Eisaku, Nagai Nobuhiro, Noda Sachiko, Tachino Genichiro, Takahashi Tatsuichiro, Takeuchi Hiroyoshi, Kikuchi Toshiaki, Uchida Hiroyuki, Watanabe Koichiro, Kocha Hiroki, Mimura Masaru

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The dominant diagnostic model of the classification of depression today is unitarian; however, since Kurt Schneider (1920) introduced the concept of endogenous depression and reactive depression, the binary model has still often been used on a clinical basis. Notwithstanding this, to our knowledge, there have been no collective data on how psychiatrists differentiate these two conditions. We therefore conducted a survey to examine how psychiatrists in Japan differentiate patients with major depressive disorder who present mainly with melancholic features and those with reactive features.

METHODS

Three case scenarios of melancholic and reactive depression, and one-in-between were prepared. These cases were designed to present with at least 5 symptoms listed in the DSM-IV-TR with severity being mild. We have sent the questionnaires regarding treatment options and diagnosis for those three cases on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "not appropriate", 4 = "cannot tell", and 7 = "appropriate"). Five hundred and two psychiatrists from over one hundred hospitals and community clinics throughout Japan have participated in this survey.

RESULTS

The melancholic case resulted significantly higher than the reactive case on either antidepressants (mean ± SD: 5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), hypnotics (mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, p < 0.001), and electroconvulsive therapy (mean ± SD: 1.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, the reactive case resulted in significantly higher scores compared to the melancholic case and the one- in-between cases in regards to psychotherapy (mean ± SD: 4.9 ± 1.4 vs. 4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 4.7 ± 1.5, p < 0.001, respectively). Scores for informing patients that they suffered from "depression" were significantly higher in the melancholic case, compared to the reactive case (mean ± SD: 4.7 ± 1.7 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese psychiatrists distinguish between major depressive disorder with melancholic and reactive features, and thus choose different treatment strategies regarding pharmacological treatment and psychotherapy.

Для цитирования: Mizushima Jin, Sakurai Hitoshi, Mizuno Yuya, Shinfuku Masaki, Tani Hideaki, Yoshida Kadunari, Ozawa Chisa, Serizawa Asako, Kodashiro Natsuko, Koide Shinya, Minamisawa Atsumi, Mutsumoto Eisaku, Nagai Nobuhiro, Noda Sachiko, Tachino Genichiro, Takahashi Tatsuichiro, Takeuchi Hiroyoshi, Kikuchi Toshiaki, Uchida Hiroyuki, Watanabe Koichiro, Kocha Hiroki, Mimura Masaru. Melancholic and reactive depression: a reappraisal of old categories.. BMC psychiatry. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-311.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.