Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2012
Indications for orbital decompression for patients undergoing keratoprosthesis surgery.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Norris Jonathan H, Carpenter David, Al Raqqad Nancy, Brittain Paul, Daya Sheraz, Liu Christopher, Malhotra Raman
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Optimizing the ocular surface and achieving acceptable cosmesis are important considerations in the rehabilitation of patients with keratoprosthesis (KPro). In osteo-odonto-KPro and type 1 Boston KPro surgery, it is important to ensure a healthy ocular surface to increase the chance of functional success.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors present 2 patients with KPros undergoing orbital decompression surgery. This series highlights a novel indication for orbital decompression surgery for patients, who are usually 1-eyed, undergoing KPro surgery. It illustrates the importance of globe position to either optimize the ocular surface or allow a cosmetic shell to be worn. To the authors' knowledge, such indications for orbital decompression have not been reported to date.
RESULTS: Two-wall and intraconal fat orbital decompression surgery achieved globe retroplacement of 6 mm and 7 mm, allowing fitting of a cosmetic shell over the osteo-odonto-KPro and reducing lagophthalmos and corneal exposure in patients 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Indications for orbital decompression exist in patients undergoing osteo-odonto-KPro or KPro to reduce pseudoproptosis or exposure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors present 2 patients with KPros undergoing orbital decompression surgery. This series highlights a novel indication for orbital decompression surgery for patients, who are usually 1-eyed, undergoing KPro surgery. It illustrates the importance of globe position to either optimize the ocular surface or allow a cosmetic shell to be worn. To the authors' knowledge, such indications for orbital decompression have not been reported to date.
RESULTS: Two-wall and intraconal fat orbital decompression surgery achieved globe retroplacement of 6 mm and 7 mm, allowing fitting of a cosmetic shell over the osteo-odonto-KPro and reducing lagophthalmos and corneal exposure in patients 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Indications for orbital decompression exist in patients undergoing osteo-odonto-KPro or KPro to reduce pseudoproptosis or exposure.