Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2021
Role of ultrasonographic parameters for predicting tubal involvement in infertile patients affected by endometriosis: A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stepniewska Anna Katarzyna, Clarizia Roberto, De Mitri Paola, Pesci Anna, Zorzi Carlotta, Albanese Mara, Trivella Giamberto, Guerriero Massimo, Improda Francesco Paolo, Ceccaroni Marcello
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Transvaginal ultrasound is fundamental for the mapping of endometriosis, and the imaging criteria have been clearly described for different organs study. However, no specific ultrasonographic signs of tubal endometriosis have been reported, with the exception of hydrosalpinx, which is the expression of an extreme tubal damage and obstruction. The detection of tubal pathology in infertile patients is fundamental, therefore the aim of the study was to evaluate incidence of tubal endometriosis in infertile patients, and to analyze ultrasonographic signs useful for detection of this condition.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All 500 consecutive infertile women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis were included. The preoperative workup included transvaginal ultrasound and was compared to intraoperative findings and histologic study.
RESULTS: The incidence of tubal endometriosis in our study was 8%. Using hydrosalpinx as the ultrasonographic marker for tubal involvement the overall pooled, sensitivity and specificity of TVU were 12% (95%CI, 5-23%) and 99% (95%CI, 98-100%), respectively. If at least one ultrasonographic parameter like hydrosalpinx, periadnexal adhesions or ovarian cyst was considered as a sign of tubal endometriosis, a sensitivity, VPN and specificity were 94% (95% IC, 85-98%), 97% (95%IC, 93-99%) and 31% (95%CI, 27-36%), respectively.
DISCUSSION: Hydrosalpinx as ultrasonographic sign alone is characterized by a high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of tubal endometriosis; its sensitivity can be improved by the addition of other markers such as endometrioma and/or periadnexal adhesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: It is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. All 500 consecutive infertile women who underwent laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis were included. The preoperative workup included transvaginal ultrasound and was compared to intraoperative findings and histologic study.
RESULTS: The incidence of tubal endometriosis in our study was 8%. Using hydrosalpinx as the ultrasonographic marker for tubal involvement the overall pooled, sensitivity and specificity of TVU were 12% (95%CI, 5-23%) and 99% (95%CI, 98-100%), respectively. If at least one ultrasonographic parameter like hydrosalpinx, periadnexal adhesions or ovarian cyst was considered as a sign of tubal endometriosis, a sensitivity, VPN and specificity were 94% (95% IC, 85-98%), 97% (95%IC, 93-99%) and 31% (95%CI, 27-36%), respectively.
DISCUSSION: Hydrosalpinx as ultrasonographic sign alone is characterized by a high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of tubal endometriosis; its sensitivity can be improved by the addition of other markers such as endometrioma and/or periadnexal adhesions.