Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion · 2008
[Hemodynamic variability caused by pressure-volume plotting and alveolar recruitment maneuvers in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pestaña D, Royo C, Hernández-Gancedo C, Martínez-Casanova E, Criado A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The plotting of pressure-volume curves and the performance of alveolar recruitment maneuvers are common practices in the care of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), even though potentially harmful hemodynamic effects are associated with sustaining a high intrathoracic pressure. Our aim was to analyze hemodynamic and ventilatory changes related to these 2 maneuvers and to assess the short-term effectiveness of recruitment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients had ARDS and were being monitored with a catheter connected to a PiCCO system. All measurements were taken in sinus rhythm and with adequate vascular filling. Values recorded during plotting of the quasistatic pressure-volume curve and the recruitment maneuver (sustained airway pressure of 40 cm H2O) were the cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, systolic volume index, and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Blood gas measurements were recorded before the maneuvers and 15 minutes afterwards.
RESULTS: All parameters decreased significantly in the 14 patients studied. The mean (SD) maximum decreases, from which all patients recovered within 2 minutes, were as follows: cardiac index, 26% (16%); mean arterial pressure, 6% (6%); heart rate, 4% (5%), systolic volume index, 21% (15%); and SpO2, 3% (3%). Significant increases in PaO2 (7% [6%]) and the ratio of PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen were recorded after the recruitment maneuver (P=.016 and P=.014, respectively), but the changes were not clinically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic disturbances associated with the alveolar recruitment maneuver based on sustaining a high end-expiratory pressure and the minor improvement in oxygenation achieved as a result suggest that the routine use of that maneuver in ARDS patients is of questionable value.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients had ARDS and were being monitored with a catheter connected to a PiCCO system. All measurements were taken in sinus rhythm and with adequate vascular filling. Values recorded during plotting of the quasistatic pressure-volume curve and the recruitment maneuver (sustained airway pressure of 40 cm H2O) were the cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, systolic volume index, and oxygen saturation (SpO2). Blood gas measurements were recorded before the maneuvers and 15 minutes afterwards.
RESULTS: All parameters decreased significantly in the 14 patients studied. The mean (SD) maximum decreases, from which all patients recovered within 2 minutes, were as follows: cardiac index, 26% (16%); mean arterial pressure, 6% (6%); heart rate, 4% (5%), systolic volume index, 21% (15%); and SpO2, 3% (3%). Significant increases in PaO2 (7% [6%]) and the ratio of PaO2 to the fraction of inspired oxygen were recorded after the recruitment maneuver (P=.016 and P=.014, respectively), but the changes were not clinically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic disturbances associated with the alveolar recruitment maneuver based on sustaining a high end-expiratory pressure and the minor improvement in oxygenation achieved as a result suggest that the routine use of that maneuver in ARDS patients is of questionable value.