Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Attention-Enhanced CNN-LSTM Model for Exercise Oxygen Consumption Prediction with Multi-Source Temporal Features.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Zhen, Song Yingzhe, Pang Lei, Li Shanjun, Sun Gang
Аннотация
Dynamic oxygen uptake (VO2) reflects moment-to-moment changes in oxygen consumption during exercise and underpins training design, performance enhancement, and clinical decision-making. We tackled two key obstacles-the limited fusion of heterogeneous sensor data and inadequate modeling of long-range temporal patterns-by integrating wearable accelerometer and heart-rate streams with a convolutional neural network-LSTM (CNN-LSTM) architecture and optional attention modules. Physiological signals and VO2 were recorded from 21 adults through resting assessment and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The results showed that pairing accelerometer with heart-rate inputs improves prediction compared with considering the heart rate alone. The baseline CNN-LSTM reached R2 = 0.946, outperforming a plain LSTM (R2 = 0.926) thanks to stronger local spatio-temporal feature extraction. Introducing a spatial attention mechanism raised accuracy further (R2 = 0.962), whereas temporal attention reduced it (R2 = 0.930), indicating that attention success depends on how well the attended features align with exercise dynamics. Stacking both attentions (spatio-temporal) yielded R2 = 0.960, slightly below the value for spatial attention alone, implying that added complexity does not guarantee better performance. Across all models, prediction errors grew during high-intensity bouts, highlighting a bottleneck in capturing non-linear physiological responses under heavy load. These findings inform architecture selection for wearable metabolic monitoring and clarify when attention mechanisms add value.